Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Barliner

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful permissions request. Please do not modify it.

Barliner (3rd nomination)

Ended on November 14, 2007 - 100% support

I would like to re-nominate Barliner for adminship. He has been a great help to this wiki as an awesome contributor, despite the fact that anybody really rewards him for doing so. While I am certainly aware, that he has been perviously nominated twice for sysophood, his second nomination from Spiderpig0001 was closed due to the fact that the nomination occurred only 2 weeks after his first one, not really making it an "official" RfA. Anyhow, Barliner is probably the most active non-admin user here as he currently has over 5000 edits (3207 in mainspace edits) and has been contributing at a very rapid pace. I also think that if he is granted sysop tools, he could monitor vandalism while the other admins are offline. I don't think he would ever abuse his sysop tools and could further help contributing in this wiki with extra tools. He has also accepted my offer on my talk page. --§ Snake311 _{(T + C)} 01:26, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate's acceptance: Accepted -- Barliner talk 17:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Support, obviously:) --§ Snake311 _{(T + C)} 01:28, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support while User_talk:Majorly#hello. ONaNcle 11:52, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- While what? I responded to your comment. Majorly (talk) 18:22, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not very often a retired editior votes support in a RfA, but it's happening!!! -- Spiderpig0001 Does whatever a spiderpig does! 10:51, 9 November 2007 (UTC) (retired)[reply]
Support. Archer7 - talk 19:45, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Having another good admin can help us fight vandalism better and faster than before. Barliner seems to be a good choice for this responsibility. - Huji ^reply 20:51, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I can only support Barliner's nomination; he has great experience editing. He also contributes quite a bit. I trust him to not misuse the tools he gets with the status change. --Eptalon 21:15, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yegoyan 00:46, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious Support - Hell Yeah !!!! ...--Comet styles 00:56, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Majorly (talk) 18:23, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I'm sure Barliner will find reat use of the tools. --Isis §^(talk) 22:17, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No problems. Jet Lover ^{An animal with an Uzi!} 23:07, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Blockinblox - talk 01:30, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

~~71.106.28.77 00:33, 13 November 2007 (UTC)~~[reply]
Single use anonymous IP edit. Only edit made from this IP -- Creol(talk) 01:05, 13 November 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Comments

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.