Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/AssumeGoodSecurity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Final (3/9/1); ended 06:19, 23 May 2022 (UTC) (non-bureaucrat closure) NotReallySoroka (talk) 06:19, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination

[edit]

AssumeGoodSecurity (talk · contribs) – Hello. I have reverted a vandalism in the past. I have reviewed many pages. My password is Roses124. I wish to get admin so I can perform non harmful tasks on the Wikipedia foundation website. AssumeGoodSecurity (talk) 04:04, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Questions for the candidate

[edit]

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. Why are you interested in becoming an administrator?
A: Roses124 is a good looking password. If I become an admin, I can change it to 125 if needed.
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A: Changing my password to Roses124.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: No, but my account sometimes automatically makes edits, conflicting with me.
4 what if one day somebody act in order to recall your adminship. what will be your response?
A: Give them 124 roses.

You may ask optional questions below. There is a limit of two questions per editor. Multi-part questions disguised as one question, with the intention of evading the limit, are disallowed. Follow-up questions relevant to questions you have already asked are allowed.

Optional question from Viewer719
1. Why is your password Roses124?
A: One day, I was conveniently collecting roses while editing Wikipedia on my phone, and I got 124. There, I thought it was a good idea to make my password a bit stronger, so I made it Roses124. It's certainly a step up from WrongCowBrickEditwar.
Optional question from Melecie
2. What do you think of correct horse battery staple?
A: It plagiarizes my old password's layout. I'm reporting it to the copyright police.
Optional question from ONUnicorn
3. Will you enable WP:2FA?
A:

Discussion

[edit]

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.

Support
[edit]
  1. Support AssumptionBot (talk) 04:20, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support I support. Oshawott 12 ==()== Talk to me! 04:27, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Increase to Bureaucrats We need better security here. I like his style.PerryPerryD Talk To Me 19:10, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose
[edit]
  1. Oppose I oppose. Oshawott 12 ==()== Talk to me! 04:27, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Speedy Oppose I oppose. Where's the brat? Indef him at once!!Pavlov2 (talk) 04:44, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose. Password is actually roses124 with a lowercase ar. Admins should know what case-sensitivity is. AssumeGoodSecurity (talk 06:02, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Wait is my account compromised? AssumeGoodSecurity (talk) 06:16, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    No, definitely not, don't worry. AssumeGoodSecurity (talk 06:35, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Nope, you fooled me, I couldn't log into your account. I will give you a strong oppose!!! Willy_on_Wheels (talk) 07:01, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose. Nowhere near enough edits in the Gadget namespace for me to take the candidate seriously. jp×g 07:24, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose I do not like your password. Kpddg (talk contribs) 08:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, if you don't like mine, is yours better? AssumeGoodSecurity (talk) 09:04, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, I have a proper logical password. There are two problems with yours': 1) Tulips are better than roses as passwords, and 2) 3 comes after 2. Kpddg (talk contribs) 09:21, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Oppose hunter2 is a much better password. —C++coder (Merry Xmas!!! | talk | talk but in italics) 12:31, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  7. I can't in good conscience support someone whose password isn't correct horse battery staple. Epicgenius (talk) 13:58, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Oppose so strongly that it cancels out any possible 'support' !vote; I prefer the password letmein. MJLMaster 15:27, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Oppose. WrongCowBrickEditWar was clearly the better password. I would maybe support if you had 123 roses. –ToxiBoi! (public) 17:16, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
[edit]
  1. Neutral I neutral. Oshawott 12 ==()== Talk to me! 04:28, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I reply. AssumeGoodSecurity (talk) 04:28, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


General comments
[edit]
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.