Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/AresAndEnyo

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

AresAndEnyo

Final (0/6/0); ended 21:40, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

AresAndEnyo (talk · contribs) – AresAndEnyo is a good user and deserves to become administrator as he is an asset to wikipedia AresAndEnyo 20:49, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: It Accepts

Sorry, but with forty-seven edits and an account less than two days' old this RfA will never gather enough votes to achieve consensus. You need to be active on Wikipedia for six months or more and to make effective contributions in all of the main spaces - articles, user Talk, policy, process, vandal fighting are key to working effectively as an admin. This won't be WP:SNOW so much as a hailstorm. (aeropagitica) 21:43, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog and Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A: I am prepared to do my share, let's just say that.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A: It's continual work on the Australian Music section is of particular importance. Australian Music is being neglected in todays Wikipedia. It's passion and intimate knowledge as a result of it's band makes it's contributions to this area of particular quality that should be noted. It intends to continue it's work on this. Music is a very volatile area and needs to be updated constantly to keep up with new trends. Also it believes the genre classification of most of the music artists could be more useful if a bit more specific, instead of having 30% Alternative, 40% Rock and 20% Pop, should try and extend into classification such as Boroque Pop, Noise Rock, Post Grunge, Adult Alternative and many more. If you get what it means.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: No problems. I take pride in that.

General comments

See AresAndEnyo's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.

Discussion

Support

Support great user --AresAndEnyo 20:56, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Generally it's considered a faux pas to vote for yourself in an rfa. Just H 21:06, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Oppose and speedy removal - First edit was yesterday, 47 edits in total. However, I believe this user is not a vandal, but a new user not aware of the process in Wikipedia. Please transfer yourself to Wikipedia:Editor review. Thanks. AQu01rius (User  Talk) 21:02, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. You joined Wikipedia two days ago. You seem like a good user thus far, but I suggest you wait a while before submitting an RfA. People usually wait until they get ~3,000 edits and 6 months experience on Wikipedia. Also, read policy guidelines, and other Wikipedia protocol. Nishkid 64 21:00, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others...Way too soon. — Seadog_MS 21:05, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Far too inexperienced. Voting for self is proof of this. Please remove this rfa, and I ask others to Assume Good Faith Just H 21:06, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not enough edits or experience. If you really do want to become an admin, get some more edits spread out across namespaces and come back in at least 5-6 months. You obviously want to help the encyclopedia, but it's to soon to become an admin. For now, I strongly suggest withdrawal. –The Gr e at Llama^{sign here} 21:12, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose and speedy removal, it is a nonsense - 2 days of wiki-career and 46 edits are not enough to evaluate an ordinary editor, what to say about an administrator. Speaking about himself as for a third-person is making me nervous. -- Goldie (tell me) 21:12, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.