Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Abhiraj010

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Voice your opinion on this candidate (talk page) (0/0/0); Scheduled to end 09:57, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Monitors:

Nomination

[edit]

Abhiraj010 (talk · contribs) – Hello everyone, I am requesting adminship because I am committed to improving Wikipedia by maintaining accuracy, neutrality, and fairness. Over time, I have contributed by making constructive edits, engaging in discussions, and helping maintain the integrity of Wikipedia’s content.

I believe my experience in handling edits, following Wikipedia’s policies, and assisting new users makes me a good candidate for adminship. If granted administrator privileges, I will focus on countering vandalism, resolving disputes, and ensuring a positive editing environment.

While I acknowledge that no editor is perfect, I have always been open to feedback and learning from mistakes. I am ready to take on this responsibility and contribute even more to Wikipedia. Thank you for considering my request. Abhiraj010 (talk) 09:51, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I, Abhiraj010, accept this nomination and confirm my willingness to serve as a Wikipedia administrator. I acknowledge the responsibilities and will abide by Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines.

Questions for the candidate

[edit]

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. Why are you interested in becoming an administrator?
A: I want to become an administrator to help maintain Wikipedia’s integrity by preventing vandalism, resolving disputes, and ensuring that all edits align with Wikipedia’s guidelines. With administrative tools, I can contribute more effectively to keeping Wikipedia a reliable and well-organized source of knowledge.
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A: My best contributions include creating and improving articles, reverting vandalism, and participating in discussions to ensure content neutrality. I have actively helped maintain article quality and assisted new users in understanding Wikipedia policies.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: I have encountered minor disagreements, but I always approach conflicts with patience and adherence to Wikipedia’s dispute resolution process. I focus on constructive discussions and policy-based reasoning to resolve issues. In the future, I will continue to handle conflicts calmly and work collaboratively with other editors to find the best solutions.

You may ask optional questions below. There is a limit of two questions per editor. Multi-part questions are disallowed, but you are allowed to ask follow-up questions related to previous questions.

Discussion

[edit]

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.

Numerated (#) "votes" in the "Support", "Oppose", and "Neutral" sections may only be placed by editors with an extended confirmed account. All other comments are welcome in the "general comments" section.

Support
[edit]


Oppose
[edit]


Neutral
[edit]


General comments
[edit]