Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines

1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines

B. Carry out these checks

1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.

C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted

1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.

D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability

1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.

1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
   • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
   • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.

Create a discussion page.

1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
   • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
   • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
   • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.

List it here

1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:

   {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/(name of page to be deleted)}}

4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review

• The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
• Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
• Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
• Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
• New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
• Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
• Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete keep".
• If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
• Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
• Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.

• All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

Massive cock

Massive cock (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

QuicoleJR has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI-generated essay which is loosely related to the article title. QuicoleJR (talk) 22:33, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:33, 21 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Sean Bloom

Sean Bloom (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

50.202.176.117 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This subject does not appear to be notable outside of the en:WP:ONEEVENT. 50.202.176.117 (talk) 18:25, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:25, 21 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

ZipKing

ZipKing (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Ternera (talk) 17:28, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:28, 21 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Portal de actualidad

Portal de actualidad (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. The numerous sources have nothing to do with the platform. Ternera (talk) 14:52, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:52, 21 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Last man stands cricket

Last man stands cricket (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BlackJack has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is a very minor variant of cricket that has little credibility, and could reasonably be called a "passing fad". If it should ever take off and stage professional tournaments, the article can be recreated. As things are now, the article has little if any potential for development. Essentially, the subject does not have notability, and fails WP:GNG. Thanks. Jack (talk) 13:56, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:56, 21 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Chamar Koli (2nd nomination)

Chamar Koli (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Chronos.Zx has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The content appears to be a Caste warrior work. Upon verification, most of the cited sources fail reliability checks or do not support the stated claims. Chronos.Zx (talk) 07:00, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

also, article deletion record: Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Chamar Koli Chronos.Zx (talk) 07:01, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Comment: I've noted the same IP editor [2409:40D0:....] appears to be pushing caste-centric narratives through multiple articles. Two such examples are Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Jatav (Jat clan) and Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Chamar Koli (2nd nomination). On verification, most of the sources used in both articles either fail WP:RS or are misrepresented. Chronos.Zx (talk) 07:07, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:00, 21 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Jatav (Jat clan)

Jatav (Jat clan) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Chronos.Zx has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Look like work of Caste warrior. On verifying nearly all sources failed its verification. Chronos.Zx (talk) 06:55, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Comment: I've noted the same IP editor [2409:40D0:....] appears to be pushing caste-centric narratives through multiple articles. Two such examples are Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Jatav (Jat clan) and Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Chamar Koli (2nd nomination). On verification, most of the sources used in both articles either fail WP:RS or are misrepresented. Chronos.Zx (talk) 07:07, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 06:55, 21 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Chingon

Chingon (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Adumbrativus has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Also not a term in real use. The same page in English Wikipedia was deleted: see en:Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 28#Pathion Adumbrativus (talk) 05:53, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 05:53, 21 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Routon

Routon (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Adumbrativus has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Also not a term in real use. The same page in English Wikipedia was deleted: see en:Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 28#Pathion. Adumbrativus (talk) 05:50, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 05:50, 21 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Voudon

Voudon (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Adumbrativus has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Also not a term in real use. The same page in English Wikipedia was deleted: see en:Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 28#Pathion. Adumbrativus (talk) 05:52, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 05:52, 21 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Sculptor

Sculptor (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Catcus DeMeowwy has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Incorrect rcat (was a redirect), blank page { Catcus DeMeowwy (talk) | User_talk:Catcus DeMeowwy 02:01, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• @Catcus DeMeowwy: What is "rcat"? Anyway, I support it redirecting to Sculpture unless an article is written with this topic. TagUser (talk) 03:02, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Keep the redirect seems useful to me. Ternera (talk) 14:01, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:01, 20 May 2025 (UTC) 02:25, 21 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Bitcode

Bitcode (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

TagUser has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Written by AI TagUser (talk) 17:16, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:16, 20 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Roshan Shrestha

Roshan Shrestha (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

TagUser has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't meet requirements for WP:NPERSON. TagUser (talk) 17:13, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Keep — This article should not be deleted. It was already reviewed and renamed by an experienced admin (Fehufanga), which shows that the subject passed the basic checks for notability and clarity. The delete tag was later added by a new user who may not have seen that the page was already approved.

Roshan Shrestha is a well-known journalist and media founder in Nepal. He runs a registered news platform (Khoj Samachar) and has been covered by several national-level independent news outlets like News24 Nepal, and RatoPati News, Sidhakura. He also has a verified mobile app available on both Android and iOS.

The article is written in a neutral tone and includes strong sources. I believe it clearly meets the notability guidelines for people (WP:NPERSON). Deleting it without considering these facts would not be fair.--Factnepal (talk) 17:31, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

@Fehufanga? TagUser (talk) 17:35, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Adding one more point to support the article.

In May 2025, the Roshan Shrestha mobile app reached #5 in Nepal under the "News & Magazines – Top Free" category on Similarweb. It was listed along with well-known apps like X (Twitter), Aaj Tak, Dainik Bhaskar, and BBC News Hindi. This shows the subject’s digital reach and public recognition in Nepal’s media space.

Factnepal (talk) 19:18, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:13, 20 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Kochen mit Ruza

Kochen mit Ruza (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

TagUser has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I am not sure this subject meets WP:GNG. It is full of useless sources that are unrelated to the subject. TagUser (talk) 17:07, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:07, 20 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Deadman (character)

Deadman (character) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI/LLM generated articles, Thanks –Davey2010^Talk 20:52, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:52, 19 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Mister Terrific (Michael Holt)

Mister Terrific (Michael Holt) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI/LLM generated articles, Thanks –Davey2010^Talk 20:52, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:52, 19 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Huntress (Helena Wayne)

Huntress (Helena Wayne) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI/LLM generated articles, Thanks –Davey2010^Talk 20:52, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:52, 19 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Battle of Izki

Battle of Izki (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Iranian112 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No reliable source and this article is a stub Iranian112 (talk) 15:02, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 15:02, 19 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Conflitto russo-ucraino

Conflitto russo-ucraino (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: LLM generated translation. Ternera (talk) 14:19, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:19, 19 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Category:Whedonverse

Category:Whedonverse (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

QuantumFoam66 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: As a category that doesn't exist on English Wikipedia (and never did in the first place), this category raises various concerns (at least to me), and you should think about it instead of simply deciding to oppose this request. We have a category but not a main article titled Whedonverse. Also, on English Wikipedia "Whedonverse" is a redirect to "Buffyverse". The more important concern I have is the fact we have added pages about the well, actors and actresses who worked for Buffy the Vampire Slayer and other shows here. What's bad about this is we usually don't categorize this way (i.e. the Star Wars category does not contain the articles about the actors, directors and more for it). QuantumFoam66 (talk) 01:57, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 01:57, 17 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

International student

International student (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ieditrandomarticles has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Better fit for wikitionary rather than wikipedia Ieditrandomarticles (talk | contribs) 15:50, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep There is way more information there than you would put in a Wiktionary entry. I think it's fine as an article. --Auntof6 (talk) 16:14, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Keep: Got with Auntof6. Durjan Singh Jadon (talk) 00:59, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:50, 16 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:This date in recent years

Template:This date in recent years (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nominating a template that I don't think will serve us well here. The template has been added to a dozen or so "<month> <day>" articles (for example, April 15). Here is what you see on the pages:

• The template adds a sidebar that has a heading of, for example, "April 15 in recent years".
• The sidebar has links such as "2025 (Tuesday)", "2024 (Monday)", etc. (Most of the links are currently still red because the template is being adapted from enwiki, which uses it differently.)
• You would expect the link that says "2025 (Tuesday)" to link to "April 15, 2025". However, we don't have articles for individual days like that. Instead, as an example, the one blue link on April 15 is April 2025, which redirects to the April events section of 2025 (because we also don't have articles at the month/year level).
• OK, so you would expect to find something there, but no. There doesn't happen to be anything in 2025 for April 15. Our year articles don't all have something for every day of the year.

The enwiki version of this template probably works well there because enwiki probably has stuff for every day of the year. We don't. For this template to be useful here, we would need redirect pages for every month/year combination (at least those within the last 10 years), and to create them for future months as time passes. I don't think we need that maintenance task, so I propose removing this template from pages that currently use it, and deleting the template, its subpages, the redirects that were created to support it (such as April 25), and the page that redirects to it. Auntof6 (talk) 12:59, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Unless some madlad decides to go through and keep every single date up to date then it is just not worth it to keep here. Ieditrandomarticles (talk | contribs) 15:37, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment: It looks like an IP has added the template to the remaining month/day articles. If this RFD passes, it would be simple to automate removing it using AWB. If the closing admin would like me to take care of that (again, if the RFD passes), feel free to ask. --Auntof6 (talk) 20:24, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:59, 16 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Fidji

Fidji (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

TagUser has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No evidence for notability of this micronation. TagUser (talk) 20:29, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:29, 15 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Category:Human communication

Category:Human communication (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

QuantumFoam66 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I'm surprised this category has been sitting here for years, because there's one major issue here; "Human communication" simply refers to everything communication by humans as opposed to animals.We already have Animal communication, so perhaps all pages in this category should be merged to Category:Communication or the other way around. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 18:26, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:26, 15 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Devan Leos (3rd nomination)

Devan Leos (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable actor, Cannot find any evidence of any notability,

Has been in 1 movie and 3 TV shows - one tv show was a regular role (44 eps) and the rest are one-bit parts. Majority of sources are either GOSSIP, TABLOID or simply LOCALCOVERAGE.

Given they've not been multiple roles (and 44 eps isn't really much to brag about) I would still say this fails en:NACTOR and en:GNG.

He was also charged with attempted murder but again no notability around that either so fails en:WP:PERP too,

For full transparency this article was RFD'd by someone else at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Devan Leos (2nd nomination) and that was overturned at DRV[1] primarily because the RFD was closed as SOFTDELETE, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 09:54, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Speedy Keep As stated here, Leos had numerous big roles. Let's fact check the nominators claims: "Has been in 1 movie and 3 TV shows"

According to Leos's IMDB page he's been in:

1. Life Happens (Movie)

2. Grave Secrets (movie)

3. Dream Cleaners (movie)

4. Madeas Witness Protection (movie)

5. The Pretty One (movie)

^That's 5 movies

As for TV Shows:

1. Mighty Med (TV show)

2. Criminal Minds (TV Show)

3. ICarly (TV Show)

4.Guliver Quinn (TV show)

5.Deadtime Stories (TV short)

6. The Middle (TV series) 7. Jessie (2011 TV series)

8. Austin and Alley (TV show)

9. Marvin Marvin (TV Show)

^That's 9 TV shows

Leos was also in Final Fantasy

"One tv show was a regular role (44 eps) and the rest are one-bit parts."

^False

Leos played the brother of Trish (the lead role) in Austin and Alley, starring in multiple episodes. Leos also played Henry in Multiple episodes across four seasons in The Middle

Additionally, in Madeas Witness Protection, Leos played the co-starring main role. Not only that, but out of 13 Madea movies, Witness Protection is the 4th highest grossing one.

"Majority of sources are either GOSSIP, TABLOID or simply LOCALCOVERAGE"

There are 16 sources. The only Tabloid sources I see are:

1. Radar online (Gossip-y but does indicate notability)
2. TMZ (maybe) ^only 2 These sources are particularly compelling: 1. Ok Magazine (Entertainment News site) [1] 2. Newsweek (widely read national digital news publication) [2] 3. SF Weekly (Technically local) [3] 4. Distractify (US publication with international reach) [x] These sources also demonstrate notability and credibility: 1. Grit Daily [4] 2. The Observer [5] The other sources aren't AS strong, but still show notability and pass WP:GNG . They don't seem to be passing mentions, and one even article covers an award he received. The fact that Leos was the main star of a popular Disney show is arguably notable in itself. Factor in that he also founded a notable AI company, AFTER "He was also charged with attempted murder" is not only notable, but remarkable. I mean regardless of the details, this guy was charged with attempted murder, and instead of continuing to be bad, he completely turned his life around. Let's not forget that being branded as a murderer likely (significantly) lowers the probability of career opportunities, growth, and success. To me this seems like an Iron clad case of notability. There's substance to this subject, and I may be biased because I watched him as a kid, but out of everyone on that show, this guy's story strikes me as the most profound and noteworthy. Ask yourself this: If you described this subjects life in detail to your mother (or anyone) who knows nothing about celebs, based on this page, and then asked "Do you think that person sounds notable?" they'd most likely say yes. Notability ≠ fame (Per WP:GNG). Side note: The consistent pattern of people nominating this subject without even doing research is troubling (e.g. nomination 2 stating "only see one major television role, nothing else", and nominator 3 also being completely wrong and mistaken about the number of movies and TV shows the subject's been in)

WP:NACTOR states the following can qualify notability:

1. 1. Has had important roles in several notable movies, television shows, stage performances, or other productions: (a) Madea's Witness Protection (co star) (b) Mighty Med (star) (c)The Middle (recurring role)
   2. Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following. (He has 1M+ followers on Instagram)

Scripfowl (talk) 04:02, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

My apologies he has indeed been in more than 4 movies/shows however with the exception of Mighty Med these were all still 2-bit roles, The cites you list are all GOSSIP/TABLOID or LOCAL, I'm not seeing anything substantial here,

Personally I don't believe Instagram is a fan base per se as new accounts mass-follow people in order to lift restrictions etc, They've only had one notable role so imho still fails NACTOR,

All in all I'm not seeing any notability here, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 09:53, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

• keep Im the creator of this page. I agree with @Scripfowl's arguments.... Devan played a very notable role in Mighty Med, AND in Austin and Alley AND in Madea. The article needs to be updated and improved, not deleted....

2603:8001:1DF0:94E0:CC24:790C:55D8:E3A0 (talk) 15:09, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Not to BLUDGEON the discussion but strictly speaking the ending to your rationale is incorrect as this isn't a nomination based on AI slop or grammatical errors (either of which can be fixed), this is based on notability (which can and can't be improved/fixed). We can't make someone notable if they're not notable is what I'm getting at (although I'm aware you think he's notable and that's fine, he may well be notable and I may be wrong) –Davey2010^Talk 17:13, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

• Comment I added some additional sources. (one that shows he's the only former Disney actor to have been charged with attempted murder) Ok Magazine seems really strong. I think this subject is definitely notable, but if theres issue with amount of sources, it seems possible more sources covering him will emerge, and that it's not a notability issue? Maybe I'm wrong... but as @Scripfowl pointed out in their argument according to WP:NACTOR it seems a pass... @Davey2010 do you have an argument for how he doesnt pass NP:ACTOR? Wouldn't the Tyler Perry movie, The Middle, and Mighty Med shows at least count? Also, with him developing an new AI technology, that seems to be the first of it's kind, and recognized for it, I do think thats worth consideration. The film industry is anti-AI so its certainly interesting.

2603:8001:1DF0:94E0:1C5B:142C:51CF:DCCB (talk) 06:45, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

• The premise of the AI point is not quite true. Undetectable.ai competes in a crowded field of start-ups with similar products, similar coverage in the media, and similar claimed user-base sizes. AI detection has existed for as long as generative AI has been popular. Finally, the subject is a chief communications officer. The notion that he has "developed a new AI technology" is a stretch and the extent of his contributions beyond being a founder is essentially unverified anywhere the company has been discussed. Hiàn 01:22, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

• Delete as many passing mentions in minor sources. The Newsweek one appears major, but does not support the linked passage in this wiki's article. It's just puffery and Newsweek has seen better days. May not even be a major periodical any longer. --Gotanda (talk) 23:44, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete. I've been quite clear previously (at the 2nd RfD and at the deletion review) that I do not regard the subject as satisfying WP:NACTOR nor WP:NBUSINESSPEOPLE. The contributors to this article (as argued above) seem to be arguing notability on the basis of minor extra-level or 1-time roles in major television shows. This is a fundamental misunderstanding of WP:NACTOR, which requires important roles in major shows/movies. As it stands, the subject simply does not meet the threshold of notability for WP:NACTOR, despite the contributors' best attempts to misinterpret the guidelines.
  I'll also briefly discuss the business and AI. I have maintained that the subject is not notable on the basis of the business. This much is clear - Undetectable.ai is not a particularly big fish in AI. As we've seen argued in some of the discussions, I assert that involvement in this field does not grant inherent notability. We cannot judge notability on the basis of being involved in some "novel" technology, because the subject has made few verifiable notable contributions to this field. Being a chief communications officer is a weak claim, at best. Finally, the contribution of AI detection companies like GPTZero and Undetectable.ai to AI ethics is insignificant at best. Discussion is now mostly about the subject's pivot to AI. This is a more compelling point, and if WP:NACTOR is sufficiently satisfied, then there may be a case there. But as it stands, WP:NACTOR is not, and so this point does not help the subject's case. Hiàn 02:04, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

  That's a really slanted representation---and not true. He had leading roles in Madea, Mighty Med, and Austin and Alley. Not "minor extra-level or 1-time roles in major television shows" he was in Austin and Alley twice as a main character, the Middle he was in four times, Mighty Med he was the star of, and he was also the co-star in Madea Witness Protection. These alone grant NACTOR.

  Did you even do a real review? By your definition, he fits NACTOR. What roles did you think were one-off? Scripfowl (talk) 00:49, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

  Forgive me, if the article is anything to go by, Austin and Ally is a two-off role. You got me there! Hiàn 01:57, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

  On a more serious note, I still think you're misinterpreting the guideline. No one is disputing the subject's role in Mighty Med. That is indeed an "important" role in a "major" show. The Madea role is not a co-star role, as claimed (are we taking the conventional understanding of what "starring" in a show/movie means?). Even if we included it in the final count, this is not "several" roles of note. And finally, we're looking for "important" roles. For a television show, such a role might be one of sustained importance, not a important role in 2 episodes of a 4 season, 87 episode show (for Austin and Ally) nor 4 episodes of a 9 season, 215 episode show (in The Middle). In these two cases, I think your argument is a stretch. Please rest assured, I've done my best to thoughtfully review the article, and would not be here if I believed there was a strong case for notability. Hiàn 02:13, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep

I have researched this subject pretty thoroughly and believe they fit within notability guidelines. After removing genuine one liner name-drops, the article still rests on (a) starring roles that unambiguously meets WP:NACTOR and (b) several high-quality, independent RS that pass WP:GNG. Deletion would therefore conflict with core inclusion policy; so as another mentioned, the correct course is cleanup not removal. However:

I think it’s fair to do a proper review. First, the subject did indeed star as an important and non trivial role in Madea's Witness Protection (as mentioned by other editors, this was in fact a significant and notable film, and Leos played a main character) also Leos is billed as one of five principals in the 44 episode Disney XD series Mighty Med (2013–15); Disney-owned, nationally broadcast covered in trades that alone triggers the important-roles presumption in WP:NACTOR. Then we have multiple independent RS give non-trivial coverage: Observer long-form (2024), Newsweek feature (2024), TheWrap renewal story (2014) plus regional daily SCV Signal. That comfortably clears WP:GNG (“several” independent, reliable, secondary sources of significant depth). Even if one discounts the AI startup angle entirely, the acting criterion stands; the startup coverage merely strengthens notability. Any tabloid or trivial refs can be pruned per WP:UNDUE without endangering compliance.

TheTakoDread (talk) 18:15, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the comment. Notability and the sources have been discussed at length above, so I won't rehash the arguments. I did want to examine the Newsweek source in more detail.

• First, there is a general consensus at enwiki that the reliability of Newsweek is not assured for articles published after 2013. Note that this is not a silver bullet and articles still ought to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
• Second, let's note that the article specifically notes a "recent BBC interview" (relative to the article's publication in October 2024). There is no evidence of such an interview even existing. The last public interview Musk did with the BBC was in April 2023, and there was (to the extent that I've skimmed the transcript) no mention of AI, certainly no specific mention of Undetectable.ai (the timeline doesn't fit anyways).

• Aside: I would love to be proved wrong on this one. I've searched for other sources that could've possibly attested to Musk speaking about Undetectable.ai or the subject. I've searched for sources where Musk discussed AI in higher education. I've searched for sources that have attested to this supposed BBC interview in 2024. All of this has turned up nothing.

• Third, the linked video is a dead link. For news sources, this is ordinarily not a problem, but in this case it needs more attention. The video page (not the video itself) was archived at the Internet Archive, with the title "Elon Musk FIRES BACK At Reporter In NEW INTENSE Interview! (2024)". This is trivially neither an official BBC source, nor the work of a reputable source. A quick search shows that this may be the video the article is referencing (same title), which also makes no mention of Undetectable.ai.
• Finally, even if we considered the article at face value, it is wholly inconsistent with itself. It claims in the headline that Musk has praised the subject directly, but then makes no mention of the praise in the article body. All I see is praise of the company itself, which we cannot infer is praise of the subject. This is clickbait at best, and misinformation at worst. In either case, I think we can agree that this doesn't constitute a source of "significant depth" (WP:GNG).

In light of this, I move that the Newsweek reference not be considered reliable in the context of this RfD. Hiàn 00:43, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

I actually find the article from The Santa Clarita Valley Signal quite interesting. Perhaps it is worth some thought as well.

• First, The Signal does considerable paid advertising alongside its news content (consider this sample page of results and this obvious but undisclosed advertisement that was linked on the front page).
• Second, the author of the article is a "jhilton". I think the articles published by this author speak for themselves (really! If you're passing by, take a look and judge whether these are suitable for inclusion). And unlike The Signal's news articles, the article about the subject comes with a disclaimer: "DISCLAIMER: No part of the article was written by The Signal editorial staff." Enough said.

In light of this, I move that The Signal reference also not be considered reliable. It reads much like a tabloid advertisement anyways, so I'd hope this makes the decision clearer. This gets us down to 2 sources that we can consider reliable. That is by no means a comfortable satisfaction of WP:GNG, and I would say it is a stretch altogether to say it is even borderline. Hiàn 01:09, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:54, 15 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Bayaz Aliyeva

Bayaz Aliyeva (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: not notable per nsport MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 03:08, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 03:08, 15 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Shafagat Alishanova

Shafagat Alishanova (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: not notable per nsport MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 03:08, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 03:08, 15 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Acebott Co. Ltd.

Acebott Co. Ltd. (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Cactusisme has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Almost none of the references is relevant to the topics, author is likely adding so many references to show notability. Article fail corporation guidline. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 09:43, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete, is what i am leaning toward.--Not notable. No mention at en-wiki,if asked. 2001:2020:303:BB75:7461:2AD0:24C1:60F4 (talk) 12:21, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:43, 14 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:Eye symptoms and signs

Template:Eye symptoms and signs (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nominating two navigational box templates that have either one or no blue links for the topics they are supposed to navigate. The job of a navigational box is to allow users to navigate between related pages. Without more than one article to navigate, the template can't do that job.

• Template:Eye symptoms and signs: has blue links for headers, but none for signs or symptoms
• Template:Infectious disease symptoms and signs: has blue links for headers, but only one for a sign or symptom

-- Auntof6 (talk) 07:18, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Voting support (Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion) reason: RfD/voting this page for deletion to merge the template that is better. There would be no use having two of the same template (I thought this was a different template with the same name from backlog). RfD/support (voting yes) and cooperating because I hope that another editor can find such template on en. Wiki (it is *named similarly and *has another box (the heading/cat that "Adnexa, Globe is in)" for Lacrimal Pupil Cornea Iris retina having their own boxes in that style (on the 2nd heading). There were at least three links in these h2 boxes and whether they are blue links or can be on backlog to be made would be very useful and aesthetic.

signed User:Catcus_DeMeowwy { Catcus DeMeowwy (talk) | User_talk:Catcus DeMeowwy 11:51, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

I vote that we keep and simply try to populate empty navboxes, and have something like popcat for navboxes sitewide. It is not impossible to do and if you give me time I will get it done (for example the infectious eye diseases box has is on my to-do list/backlog to do for the three main categories on it. The three types of eyes. This leads into a bunch of other things that you just have to trust me on like idk meningitis.

If we start deleting boxes that are empty then we delete a lot of the Wiki. But do whatever you want, I do not care and in 5 minutes you will find something else to ping me about to delete something that I have worked on or made (these things are actually copied from en. Wiki). { Catcus DeMeowwy (talk) | User_talk:Catcus DeMeowwy 11:10, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

This is not starting to delete navboxes that don't have enough blue links. That is often done. It is not the same as categories that have too few entries. Underpopulated categories can still do their job of helping people find things. Navboxes without multiple relevant blue links can't do the job of a navbox. -- Auntof6 (talk) 12:51, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

See my other comment. Voting support for deletion (of navbox). I forget the template: to show "vote" but you can edit my comment to include it if it matters. BRB { Catcus DeMeowwy (talk) | User_talk:Catcus DeMeowwy 14:36, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Would like a pause on the deletion of (the) infectious diseases template/navbox, so that I can populate it with blue links. I think these links are pretty valuable for the wiki and would like to volunteer to translate them to here. Mentioned already on the talk:template https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Infectious_disease_symptoms_and_signs { Catcus DeMeowwy (talk) | User_talk:Catcus DeMeowwy 20:51, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

The template only serves a purpose if the articles already exist. I'd oppose keeping a template because of what might happen in the future. If/when enough articles exist, it would be easy enough to restore the template. -- Auntof6 (talk) 23:03, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Let me know if there are any problems with cats also (such as in catː Occupational diseases), and I can try to popcat some of them { Catcus DeMeowwy (talk) | User_talk:Catcus DeMeowwy 04:14, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

do or if you give me time I will get it done (for example the infectious eye diseases box has is on my to-do list/backlog to do for the three main categories on it. The three types of eyes.

edit: this one is not actually on the list and the eye diseases on the to-do is a different thing

This leads into a bunch of other things that you just have to trust me on like idk meningitis.

If we start deleting boxes that are empty then we delete a lot of the Wiki. But do whatever you want, I do not care and in 5 minutes you will find something else to ping me about to delete something that I have worked on or made.

Just to say also that I am caring less with each day - and I do not know if it is intentional (why you are doing it) but I am really starting to care less. I think it is less about an "empty template" (not like there is scarcity) and just something else for you to pull me up about as there are many things as your thing is constant and unrelenting. It is rapidly approaching the point where I say you go back to deleting the pages I made whenever you feel like it and without warning (not like I change the outcome anyway). And I would like to say - again - that it is every day, multiple times a day. ALL THE TIME I have to stop what I am doing because I get an alert like this, where you want to do something like this. Maybe if you left me to it more I would get things done

Signed { Catcus DeMeowwy (talk) | User_talk:Catcus DeMeowwy 11:15, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Furthermore, just to let @Auntof6 know, that this template (in chars) is actually smaller than the last topic they created on my talk page - by 7k chars. It could even be populated by people going to the page and creating articles from red links, but would like to see this over with quickly, because as it stands right now all the articles (that actually exist) using the navbox/template are probably RfD right now

{ Catcus DeMeowwy (talk) | User_talk:Catcus DeMeowwy 11:33, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

• Delete (Eye symptoms and signs), for sure, as things stand; That is what i am leaning toward.--Excellent call, user:Auntof6. (That template needs, 3 blue links 'that count', in other words, 3 more blue links).--That other article - "my" jury is still out. 2001:2020:331:FBBD:A8DD:89C4:4A4B:E0A0 (talk) 14:58, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

  Just a quick note. From: https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Catcus_DeMeowwy#c-Catcus_DeMeowwy-20250427213900-Catcus_DeMeowwy-20250427082100

  This is obviously the same user and this list ties in all of his "accounts" { Catcus DeMeowwy (talk) | User_talk:Catcus DeMeowwy 15:22, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

  When you say "other article" do you mean the one with the topic that you commented in (deleting loads of text from other people) before, if you even did? The other article from your now-reverted topic. Did you mean to put the message in that topic? Asking here because the user literally can not be reached, not via his talk page or any article talk page (not sure he even checks this. I want to know if he meant to respond in that other topic, and what the "other article" he is talking about - disregarding his message about this because it is close to being gibberish { Catcus DeMeowwy (talk) | User_talk:Catcus DeMeowwy 15:25, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

• (cleanup links) Putting in my contributions list to say that I will remember to check WhatLinksTo symptoms and signs of the eye. { Catcus DeMeowwy (talk) | User_talk:Catcus DeMeowwy 20:44, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Would also like to say for the other template (infectious disease symptoms and signs)

I have mentioned that on the talk page for the article (template). https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Infectious_disease_symptoms_and_signs. I think this info is valuable for simple Wikipedia and would like to volunteer to include it. { Catcus DeMeowwy (talk) | User_talk:Catcus DeMeowwy 20:49, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Please stop using the {{wait}} template for anything related to these templates. That template is for quick deletions. There is no quick deletion request for these templates, only this RFD. Thanks. -- Auntof6 (talk) 23:12, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Was not aware of this { Catcus DeMeowwy (talk) | User_talk:Catcus DeMeowwy 00:43, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:18, 7 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Prapti Shukla

Prapti Shukla (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hiàn has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Hiàn 01:41, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep This page have reliable sources, thats why, page sbould not be deleted. MukherjeeRicha99 (talk) 08:21, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete non-notable Raayaan9911 09:21, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:41, 7 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Alisha Parveen

Alisha Parveen (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

AurKestra has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: English Wikipedia already deleted and person come with new id and make again and again Reffer Deletion Log of english wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=delete&page=Alisha_Parveen

thank you! AurKestra (talk) 08:34, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete English Wikipedia already deleted and person come with new id and make again and again

Reffer Deletion Log of english wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=delete&page=Alisha_Parveen— Preceding unsigned comment added by AurKestra (talk • contribs) 09:17, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

• Keep This is not a valid tag because as per history, some one just join the wikipedia and just adding tags to this page, I think this user have some personal issue with this page so thats why user ia adding multiple tag again and again after warning, as per previous log the page was deleted in November 2024, Its more than 6 months gone and this page have sufficient articles which show good notability, so i think we shoul keep this page.

• Keep Draft of This page was created by me English wikipedia and it have multiple reliable sources, so my vote is to keep this page. Alishap01 (talk) 16:33, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep - As someone who routinely goes with "It was deleted at Enwiki so should be deleted here".... Honestly I'm not seeing a reason to delete, The article is adequately sourced and she (imho) appears to meet WP:NACTOR #1 as she was in

• 102 eps of TV Series en:Anupamaa
• 201 eps of TV Series en:Udaariyaan
• 145 eps of TV Series en:Gathbandhan

I would say she meets GNG too but the Enwiki AFD (en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alisha Parveen) seems to say otherwise. All in all I'm seeing some notability here and not many reasons to delete, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 09:41, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:34, 6 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Oy, pri luzhku

Oy, pri luzhku (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable song, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NSONG and GNG,

Should also point out there are articles at de.wikipedia, fr.wikipedia, lv.wikipedia, no.wikipedia, ru.wikipedia and uk.wikipedia which were all created by the creator (and as we know there's next to none moderation on the lesser known sites compared to here and enwiki), Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 11:03, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Looks like a "revenge" after my "undo" of his strange "deletion". And nothing more. Nowhere in other language project any user proposed such "approach" to this article. --Tamtam90 (talk) 11:18, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Wrong. Your undo brought my attention to the article and then made me wonder whether this song was notable or not which is why I went searching and then nominated the article for deletion when I found out it wasn't.

"Nowhere in other language project any user proposed such "approach" to this article" - Again that's because those projects are less-moderated / more lax than here and or the English Wikipedia. Had you created this at the English Wikipedia it would've gone the same way, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 11:28, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

• German, French, and Russian projects are less-moderated? Well, try to do the same within one of those three projects, and we will see your results. --Tamtam90 (talk) 11:36, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
• This is a traditional folk song, both in Russia and Ukraine, in both languages (first published in 19 century). How may you dare to speak of its importance or notability, having no experience with that stuff? --Tamtam90 (talk) 11:41, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

• I'll save you the bother of searching my edits; Some projects don't have an AFD procedure at all (some have an importance tag and that's it) and those that do have an AFD procedure I've been reverted on (still have no idea why) - I will happily tell you my record with AFD/CSD on those projects is exceptionally poor because of the aforementioned reasons above. My record here and on the English Wikipedia on the other hand is great.

Editors don't need experience in a topic to determine whether it's notable or not. Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 12:06, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

• Here are only three of its prominent performers: 1, 2, 3. --Tamtam90 (talk) 11:55, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

• Singers singing a song doesn't automatically make it notable, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 12:07, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

• There are enough of sources for the song and its history (including its performance in that movie; 1). And what might make a traditional folk song notable (moreover, automatically), in your opinion? --Tamtam90 (talk) 12:16, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

• I'm still not seeing any evidence of any notability so I'll stop replying and will allow others to judge too, Have a great day, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 12:19, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:03, 3 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Behzad Qasemi

Behzad Qasemi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG --IWI (talk) 21:53, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete: per nominator. Durjan Singh Jadon (talk) 22:39, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
• Soft keep It seems to have some independent coverage Onyeeze2024 (talk) 00:35, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

  I dont think there is such thing as a soft keep. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 10:52, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

  @Cactusisme: I think you're right. Maybe Onyeeze2024 meant "weak keep." -- Auntof6 (talk) 04:18, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

• Comment I created this article by reviewing the celebrity. This person has had significant activities as a hacktivist in Iran and outside Iran, which has been reviewed by numerous media outlets. In addition, in the event of cyber attacks, he is interviewed as a cybersecurity expert to examine the dimensions of the attacks.[2] [3] [4] He also has theories, articles, and books on cybersecurity [5] [6][7][8][9]. Qeox(Talk) 05:49, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:53, 1 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Tropical Storm Peter

Tropical Storm Peter (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, no impacts on land A1Cafel (talk) 04:34, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• @A1Cafel: I think this is the same storm as in Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Tropical Storm Peter (2003), but this article should be deleted instead of redirected because it could confused with Tropical Storm Peter in 2021. 173.167.103.171 (talk) 05:04, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
• Disambiguate as there seem to be multiple tropical storms named Peter.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:56, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
• Dabify and remove the hatnote to this article in 2003_Atlantic_hurricane_season. We can make a new redirect that includes the year and links to 2003_Atlantic_hurricane_season#Tropical_Storm_Peter. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:23, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 04:34, 30 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Onyeachonam Goodluck Chikwesiri

Onyeachonam Goodluck Chikwesiri (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

92.90.252.230 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Mainly en:WP:NEWSORGNIGERIA. Fails WP:N. 92.90.252.230 (talk) 00:55, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep- There are independent sources to meet notability. Onyeeze2024 (talk) 22:57, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
• keep- The subject is notable . 182.0.200.226 (talk) 18:24, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

  Administrator note: This IP's only edit here has been this comment. -- Auntof6 (talk) 00:54, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete per nominatior, the subject is non-notable Raayaan9911 18:29, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Keep as per claim "He won the JOM Charity Awards for his innovative". Topic seems notable but not sure about the sources they are reliable or not. Bensebgli ^(Talk) 19:19, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

  I think subject is non-notable. The claim such as "In 2023, He won the JOM Charity Awards for his innovative." but it's unreliable source. I'm not sure what is this? Raayaan9911 14:53, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep- The subject is covered by reliable publications and it notable. Eberechigab (talk) 19:24, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

  Administrator note: This user has had only 3 edits here, all a week after this RFD opened. -- Auntof6 (talk) 00:56, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep if reliable and authoritative sources meet the standards then I say keep!

Not a stub, just needs alternate references. It already has lots. If that fails, reopen

But for noow at least wait:

{ Catcus DeMeowwy (talk) | User_talk:Catcus DeMeowwy 01:23, 28 April 2025 (UTC) user:catcus_meowwy

•  Delete Non-notable subject--Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 10:56, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete per nom. The sources are of dubious quality and independence (many read like paid advertisements). Awards listed are not significant, and I'd argue that the "JOM Charity Award" suffers from essentially the same issues (that is, it too is not notable). Hiàn 02:41, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 00:55, 28 April 2025 (UTC) 23:36, 28 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Subtropical Storm 01L (2023)

Subtropical Storm 01L (2023) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: not notable per en:WP:NWXTC, did not receive significant coverage MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 17:17, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Non-notable storm, minimal impacts on land. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:34, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Redirect to 2023 Atlantic hurricane season#Unnamed subtropical storm. Although, since there are no incoming links, I'd also be OK with deleting. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:40, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

  I agree with a redirect, this is probably the best option MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 18:04, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

•  Redirect per above-_Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 10:56, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:17, 28 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Category:1200s establishments by continent

Category:1200s establishments by continent (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

• Category:1190s establishments by continent (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)
• Category:1210s establishments by continent (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

· close request MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: will likely not ever have three categories, requesting deletion so that child cats can be placed in 1200s establishments, not particularly sure the guideline for this MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 02:59, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Maybe we want "<decade> establishments by continent" categories to be exceptions to the 3-entry rule. I'd rather see a discussion about that before deleting these. --Auntof6 (talk) 00:48, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

   Comment: A relevant discussion has been made here. MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 20:53, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment: Until the above linked discussion ends I believe it would be best to not close this discussion (or otherwise place it on hold) as the outcome of the discussion could directly affect the policy basis that this nomination uses.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:23, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:59, 27 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Concept of equality

Concept of equality (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: unwikified, not notable, perhaps redirect to equality? MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 12:18, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Redirect agree with nominator for the redirection part.--Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 12:31, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete There are no incoming links, so a redirect wouldn't be helpful. It's also not a term we would want used in simple language. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:59, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Redirect see no reason not to redirect to Equality as it covers the same topic area and redirects are WP:CHEAP. Unlinked redirects are still helpful.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 13:11, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:18, 21 April 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. When the discussion begun the page could've been A1'd but now that work has been done to expand the article it no longer falls under the criterion.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:11, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Keldon Johnson

Keldon Johnson (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SolarX has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Very short; no refs, only one sentence. ☀SolarX☀ 05:53, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep i improved article by referencing, adding infobox, add cats, wikifiy and added stub tag, RfD is not cleanup. Raayaan9911 15:53, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 05:53, 14 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. - FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:10, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Category:Simple medical terms

Category:Simple medical terms (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I don't think this category is helpful for the following reasons:

• It's not clear what should go here and not in the parent category Category:Medical terms. I asked the creator to add a description to the category, but I don't it describes anything we need a separate category for.
• Even if what should go here was clear, I don't think we need separate categories. There is no meaningful difference between the terms here and the terms in the parent category.

-- Auntof6 (talk) 00:20, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• It would be a shame for this to be deleted (in my opinion). It could help navigate medical terms by what is simple.

The cat could also be there to be populated by the list of terms in the template used on Signs and symptoms, a key article for the medicine-related articles on the Wiki, under "basic medical terms used to describe disease conditions." in the template:Medical_terms_to_describe_disease_conditions - by this I mean that "what could go in the cat" is:

• Signs and symptoms
• Syndrome
• Disease
• Medical diagnosis
• Differential diagnosis
• Prognosis
• Acute
• Chronic
• Cure
• Eponymous disease
• Acronym or abbreviation
• Remission

Which is a fair amount of articles (to popcat).

sig: { Catcus DeMeowwy (talk) | User_talk:Catcus DeMeowwy 00:24, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Further comment: if it was a protected or semi-protected cat, then it could be made, populated (even though population is not the concern - there is a list of terms that can go in there if wanted), and forgotten about. In the case of the template that it is related to (medical terms used to describe disease and conditions) is edited, and the cat needs changing, it can be done with notifications on for the template.

sig: { Catcus DeMeowwy (talk) | User_talk:Catcus DeMeowwy 12:23, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Just checking in :)

Wow if you all think the article/cat is that bad then you can just go and delete it now :( and (if that is the case) I mind that it got deleted not at all anymore { Catcus DeMeowwy (talk) | User_talk:Catcus DeMeowwy 01:08, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete Per nominator. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 12:42, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete per nominatior Raayaan9911 23:25, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete per nominator Gotanda (talk) 02:54, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 00:20, 10 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. - FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:10, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Akash Nanda

Akash Nanda (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

TagUser has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This person does not seem notable. The argument given for notability was that he is an advocate currently practicing at Orissa High Court. Presumably this makes him more notable than some other lawyers who do not practice at a high court. I will ask others to come to a consensus on this. TagUser (talk) 19:29, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• {{wait}} Wikialpha112 (talk) 20:49, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

  @Wikialpha112: There is no "wait" for RFDs. That is only for quick deletions. If you have a reason for keeping the article, you need to post it here. -- Auntof6 (talk) 04:38, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete. I do not see any extensive, independent coverage of the subject. I certainly do not expect a lawyer that graduated law school in 2024 to have tried any significant cases. Hiàn 03:13, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete per nominatior Raayaan9911 16:02, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:29, 9 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. - FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:10, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Shrek bike

Shrek bike (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

TagUser has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Lacks notability and is nonsensical. TagUser (talk) 19:02, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nominatior Raayaan9911 23:28, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

this doesn't make any sense, why delete this page, it dosn't hurt you in any way 192.150.244.12 (talk) 13:18, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:02, 9 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. - FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:10, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Japanese imperialism

Japanese imperialism (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rsk6400 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The page is currently a redirect to Emperor of Japan, but Imperialism is something quite different from "having an emperor". A better target would be Imperialism#Japan, but that section doesn't exist. Rsk6400 (talk) 06:32, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Japanese_colonial_empire. That is the (relevant) title at En-wiki,

en-wiki has en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_colonial_empire.

Delete, is what i am leaning toward. 2001:2020:331:FBBD:8505:E99A:535B:5807 (talk) 07:51, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 06:32, 8 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 10:39, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Battle of Sterno Ferry

Battle of Sterno Ferry (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI/LLM generated article, Thanks –Davey2010^Talk 18:54, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep, can be simplified BigKrow (talk) 19:30, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

  @BigKrow Improving, expanding and sometimes rewriting articles comes part and parcel with editing here.... but why should we be expected to simplify an article that has 5216 words and 86 paragraphs all because the creator couldn't be bothered to do it themselves?, I do rewrite articles where it's viable to do so but in cases like this where it's 11 pages of AI slop .... is it really worth the time and effort? imho no not really. As pointed out by Fusion some of these AI slops are better off nuked and recreated in non-ai form. Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 10:32, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete only ChatGPT's main page reference, AI/LLM generated article Raayaan9911 04:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete WP:TNT.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:02, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:54, 5 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 10:40, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Shivam Khajuria

Shivam Khajuria (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

AurKestra has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Hi Dear even his english wikipedia is deleted multiple times with multiple names Shivam Khajuria AurKestra (talk) 09:48, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete

even his english wikipedia is deleted multiple times with multiple names

Shivam Khajuria

Reffer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Shivam_Khajurria https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Shivam_Khajuria and u tried again to make with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Shivam_Khajuria_1

so kindly dont create deleted pages in simple wiki

it's clear AurKestra — Preceding unsigned comment added by AurKestra (talk • contribs) 09:48, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

• Keep Article have sufficient and reliable sources. 1Jukebox (talk) 10:06, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete. Fails WP:NACTOR. Hiàn 01:43, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete per Hián. Raayaan9911 14:23, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:48, 6 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. w:WP:SOFTDELETE MathXplore (talk) 08:41, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

James Michael Tracy

James Michael Tracy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable person, cannot find any evidence of any notability, awards themselves don't appear to be notable either, Fails GNG. Thanks –Davey2010^Talk 23:18, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 23:18, 12 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 08:38, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

DON SANTO

DON SANTO (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

TagUser has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable spam page. Also written by AI/LLM. TagUser (talk) 18:12, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete subject is not notable. Fails GNG. Ternera (talk) 19:44, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:12, 11 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. w:WP:SOFTDELETE MathXplore (talk) 08:37, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Francis Ohana

Francis Ohana (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

TagUser has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Full of completely irrelevant sources. TagUser (talk) 18:10, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:10, 11 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 08:34, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Zesty Get Out

Zesty Get Out (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

TagUser has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable meme. Fails WP:GNG. TagUser (talk) 02:39, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nominatior Raayaan9911 09:40, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:39, 10 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 08:32, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Bad (tour)

Bad (tour) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI/LLM generated article, Thanks –Davey2010^Talk 14:15, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nominatior Raayaan9911 18:14, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:15, 9 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 08:31, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

PopAi

PopAi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable app. The references do not mention the subject of the article. Ternera (talk) 13:28, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per Ternera. TagUser (talk) 19:03, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:28, 9 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. w:WP:SOFTDELETE MathXplore (talk) 08:29, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Mojtaba Yadegari

Mojtaba Yadegari (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable, AI-generated article. Fails WP:GNG and WP:PEOPLE. Raayaan9911 09:18, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 09:18, 9 May 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Related pages

• All archives before July 2008 - implementation of new system made archives redundant
• Category:Requests for deletion that did not succeed
• Category:Requests for deletion that succeeded
• Wikipedia:Deletion policy
• Wikipedia:Quick deletion
• Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
• Category:Deletion requests
• Category:Quick deletion requests