Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 September 8

< September 7	September 9 >

September 8

File:Haugsetting2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted here to attract more comments . --ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 15:31, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Haugsetting2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Source does not give original date of painting; I cannot determine it is after 1923. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:19, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I fail to see the problem here. This is an old public domain Norwegian educational poster that a university has made available for anyone to use on condition that it is attributed to them, see [1]. It is already properly tagged for that purpose.--Berig (talk) 17:55, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Per my statement at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 September 6#File:Haugsetting.jpg, I do not believe it's PD. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:21, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That nomination was closed as keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 11:44, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - TBH, I'm not sure why it was closed as keep: we never addressed if the image was created after 1922 or not. I may do some research and ask the admin to reconsider. Magog the Ogre (talk) 14:12, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - the earlier image has now been altered to close as delete. Maybe this will assist someone in finally closing this discussion. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:11, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Lackawaxen.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted here to attract more comments . --ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 15:31, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lackawaxen.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Neither uploader nor subsequent article give any indication on author and/or if this is pre-1923. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:25, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pinged uploader to remind him. And can I remind the nominator and closer that 1923 is not the only relevant date. Given the low rate of renewals, 1963 (date to which renewals required) and even 1977 (explicit notice required) are also important. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:37, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

True, but uploader provided evidence for neither of those either. Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:06, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Minisink Ford.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted here to attract more comments . --ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 15:31, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Minisink Ford.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

see above. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:25, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ditto. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:38, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Energy Micro EFM32 Giant Gecko Microcontroller.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Energy Micro EFM32 Giant Gecko Microcontroller.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

conflicting licensing; tagged as CC3, but states Owner=Energy Micro & links to their website; contains logos, etc. that are not de minimis - no proof of release to CC Skier Dude (talk 06:05, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:KDP LOGO - JPEG.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:KDP LOGO - JPEG.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is not (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 06:48, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:KPK Entertainment Wikipedia.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:KPK Entertainment Wikipedia.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is not (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 06:49, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:KPK Entertainment logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:KPK Entertainment logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

orphaned corporate logo; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is not (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 06:49, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Kandy City Centre Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kandy City Centre Logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 06:51, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Karinplayboy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karinplayboy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

given file name (playboy) and metadata, suspect this is a scan from said magazine Skier Dude (talk 06:52, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Karssk.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karssk.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

sports logo; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 06:53, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:ScythianC14AsiaEuropeFig6SketchEn.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

kept: the comments here are accurate for the USA, which is what matters here, but depending on what jurisdiction you live in you might not want to try this at home. See database right. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:34, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:ScythianC14AsiaEuropeFig6SketchEn.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

Highly dubious claim that "factual content is not subject to copyr." While the numbers in the graph may not be copyrightable per Feist, the image itself is. Selket ^Talk 07:14, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The "dubious claim" came from the WP admins that I consulted beforehand (Generally in the US, factual content cannot be copyrighted, though the selection, arrangement, or style of presentation might be (e.g. Feist v. Rural). Since your intention is to take part of the data (presumably copyright exempt) and create a new image from it, you probably have nothing to worry about. Dragons flight 15:41, 29 August 2006 (UTC)). That's why I recreated the graphics, which is copyrightable, and used the data contained in the original publication, which is not copyrightable. If you can advise on the changes to improve the GFDL status, I suppose it can be done, and I would appreciate your help. This one picture represents a result of many studies that are incementally vital to the article's subject. Do I need to respond elsewhere also? Barefact (talk) 20:19, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, as noted in the image description, this has "separate presentation artwork", which I take to be a statement of "I made my own way of representing these data". If that's correct (and I have no reason to say that it's not), this is not at all a problematic image. There's no way that factual content is subject to copyright; you can't sue for copyright violation just because I used some numbers that you researched and published. Nyttend (talk) 03:24, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Kazan collage.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kazan collage.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

collage of 4 images, no sources given for images, therefore impossible to determine the correct (c) Skier Dude (talk 07:16, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, it's an own work: no reason given to suspect that the uploader didn't take all of them. Nyttend (talk) 03:24, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Kdpic.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:54, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kdpic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

orphaned, multiple watermarks, no target article provided to determine what this is supposed to be Skier Dude (talk 07:16, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Possible derivative uploads by User:83d40m

Relisted from August 23. See the subpage discussion at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/Florida uploads by User:83d40m. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:18, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:KlickEx Logo.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:KlickEx Logo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 07:24, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Kollias.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kollias.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

appears to be promotional materials; no source; watermarked (c) frank marshall, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 07:25, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Komaram Puli.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Komaram Puli.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

film poster; no source but lots of watermakrs; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 07:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Peter hein2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peter hein2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

promotional materials; watermarked; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 07:28, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Komaram Puli3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Komaram Puli3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

promotional materials; watermarked; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 07:28, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Konee-frame-skyline.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Konee-frame-skyline.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

promotional photo; watermarked; states "donated by Konee Rok" bu no WP:OTRS proof, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 07:29, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:LaJoya2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:LaJoya2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

appears to be satellite image; without source, not possible to determine actual (c) state Skier Dude (talk 07:34, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Lbpsb.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lbpsb.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

school logo; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 07:37, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Learning papers 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Learning papers 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

government or corporate newsletter covers; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 07:39, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Legacy 600.pdf

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Legacy 600.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate promotional materials; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 07:39, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Citation mustang.pdf

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Citation mustang.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs).

publicity flier; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 07:41, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Hawker900xp.pdf

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hawker900xp.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs).

publicity flier; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 07:41, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cepa logo color small.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cepa logo color small.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 07:42, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cepa logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cepa logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 07:43, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cepa logo CEPA.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cepa logo CEPA.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 07:43, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cover 28.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cover 28.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

magazine cover; no source; if legit, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 07:43, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:LJalisco.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:LJalisco.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

appears to be satellite image; without source, not possible to determine actual (c) state Skier Dude (talk 07:47, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:IJalisco.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:IJalisco.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

appears to be satellite image; without source, not possible to determine actual (c) state Skier Dude (talk 07:48, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:LettheDeadSpeak.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:30, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:LettheDeadSpeak.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

book cover; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 07:54, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This book does not exist in real life. Well not yet ! Jon Ascton (talk) 08:04, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Lily-allen-22.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lily-allen-22.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

apparent album cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 07:55, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Lt. Fox Tiberon.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lt. Fox Tiberon.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

appears to be screenshot/scan of comic, but my memory fails as to the exact comic series - just very familiar Skier Dude (talk 07:58, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:F*ckYou.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:F*ckYou.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

tagged as PD-self, but summary says "screenshot from... video" - if it is a screenshot, PD wouldn't be accurate Skier Dude (talk 08:01, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MDAC.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:MDAC.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

conference/corporate logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 08:05, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Macleod Kangaroos Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Macleod Kangaroos Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

FC logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 08:07, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Majya jalmachi chttar katha.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Insofar as practice represents policy, policy is to allow covers for identification. WP:NFCI says different, and since I happen to agree with policy we'll cheerfully enforce it here. Deleted. Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:20, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Majya jalmachi chttar katha.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

book cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 08:09, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This is apparently a copyrighted image. But the subject is important enough as the book is first autobiography written by a female dalit. I have changed the lisence from pd-self to fair use. I am going to leave a message on uploaders talk page. Shivashree (talk) 03:03, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This would still leave this open to deletion as there is no critical commentary on the book in the article and the book is used only in the infobox. FuR doesn't address these issues. Skier Dude (talk 04:30, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Malay people.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Malay people.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

collage of 12 images; no sources provided for any of them Skier Dude (talk 08:13, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Maruthamallar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maruthamallar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

book cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 08:16, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MattBrouwerWORnewCoverFINAL.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:MattBrouwerWORnewCoverFINAL.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

album cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 08:18, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Maxnewyorklife logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maxnewyorklife logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logos; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 08:19, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mohawk Area School District.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mohawk Area School District.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

school dist logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 08:22, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:PR Highres logo.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Now tagged as non-free and reduced. Angus McLellan (Talk) 10:55, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PR Highres logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

This is a Durham University, Student Radio logo not a corporate one. As a member of the Purple Radio Exec. I uploaded this image and as one of the effective copyright holders I fully give permission for this to be used on wikipedia. If clarification is needed you can contact us at production@purpleradio.co.uk lucuzade (talk) 08:53, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The logo would be property of the University, which is a corporation. "The Purple Radio Promotion Team" would have to prove the release of permission for use via the WP:OTRS system. Still licensed as CC3.0, which is incorrect. Skier Dude (talk 04:33, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ikairport10.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ikairport10.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is sourced to econews which has the text © کلیه حقوق مادی و معنوی برای خبرگزاری اکونیوز محفوظ است. استفاده از مطالب این سایت با ذکر منبع بلامانع است which is roughly © All material and intellectual rights for agency Akvnyvz which does not appear to give any evidence of a free licence MilborneOne (talk) 09:37, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mehrabadt222.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mehrabadt222.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Due to the size and resolution it is unlikely to be the work of the Flikr page uploader MilborneOne (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ikatransitlounge.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ikatransitlounge.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Due to the size and resolution it is unlikely to be the work of the Flikr page uploader MilborneOne (talk) 09:59, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ikaurport6.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ikaurport6.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Hidden upload text indicates that is was copied from www.chn.ir so probably not the work of the Flikr uploader MilborneOne (talk) 10:12, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:French_Quarter_Home.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted here to attract more comments . --ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 15:31, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:French Quarter Home.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Whatever this is, I don't see how it can be claimed as self if it's a reproduction of the artist concerned's work Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:08, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The photograph is the property of the daughter. The original was donated Allworthy's family to the Louisiana State Museum (LSM). I included that in the references. The image uploaded is a photograph that belongs to the daughter of the artist, so I thought it would be public domain. If it is not, can you please direct me to how I can make that change. The painting is at the LSM. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LoliPelu (talk • contribs) 01:36, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It depends on the conditions with which the daughter donated it to the museum.
- She will probably know if the museum now owns the copyright, or if they were only given permission to show it and/or it was donated into the public domain.
- Is the daughter the executrix of her father's estate?
- When was this work first made available to the public? This, among other works, quite likely have an expired copyright but we can't be sure without more information. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:15, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:TIKL.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:TIKL.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

Clearly Logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:41, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:THEBusiness.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:THEBusiness.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Clearly promotional artwork Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:World_Martial_Arts_and_Physical_Education_Association_Emblem.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:World Martial Arts and Physical Education Association Emblem.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Organisational badge - Not sure it qualifies as self.. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:02, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Welcome to Rottingdean.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Welcome to Rottingdean.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

This is a derivative work of the pictured sign, specifically the artwork on the sign. There's no freedom of panorama for two-dimensional artworks in the United Kingdom. Thus, I don't think the uploader can properly release this image into the public domain. Powers ^T 14:09, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, it's a three-dimensional object, not a two dimensional artwork. Therefore it can be released into PD. Mjroots (talk) 09:45, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not the copyright of the sign I'm concerned about, it's the artwork on the sign, which most definitely is two-dimensional, just like a mural or a painting on a wall. Powers ^T 12:21, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:JoseMiguelCarrera.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:JoseMiguelCarrera.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

A 1950 date for the painting is not public domain: this image has never been in the public domain in Chile. Magog the Ogre (talk) 14:57, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This image has already been deleted from Commons a short time ago, see here. It may only be uploaded back, here or there, if a good rationale is provided. The deleted image stated that it was a 1950 portrait, made by Miguel Venegas Cifuentes (1907 - 1979)

In any case, this deletion shouldn't be a problem for article making, there is a category at Commons with other images of Carrera to choose from MBelgrano (talk) 02:35, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:D.Mukhopadhyay-Audio-Album-Cover-Snap.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:D.Mukhopadhyay-Audio-Album-Cover-Snap.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

apparently this is an audio album cover. Unless the uploader is a representative of the record company or whoever owns the rights to this photo, it is not free. Magog the Ogre (talk) 15:09, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Pixel_34.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pixel 34.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Logo in image makes me wonder if this can be claimed as self... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:19, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:600px-LogoDownhamMarketHighSchool.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:600px-LogoDownhamMarketHighSchool.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

derivative of [2]. Magog the Ogre (talk) 15:28, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sharden_STR.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sharden STR.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image has (C) note/watermark to eTiblisi Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:49, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:St.augustine.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:St.augustine.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Whatever this is, it's clearly NOT the uploaders's own work Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:With_Every_Breath.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:With Every Breath.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

Promotional artwork - Not enough information to confirm it is self as uploader claims Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:09, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Vtsk8crew.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vtsk8crew.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

Logo- More information needed to be sure this is self. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:14, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Spiceworks_1.5_screenshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spiceworks 1.5 screenshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Web page screenshot Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:53, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Silent_voice.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Silent voice.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This looks like it's an album cover ? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:59, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:ParallelSideos.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:ParallelSideos.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This looks like an album cover? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:01, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Roctumania.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roctumania.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Looks like album cover artwork Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:42, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. It is the cover artwork for the album Roctumania. Both the band and album are at AfD. Cindamuse (talk) 00:11, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Trilliumacres.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trilliumacres.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Clearly Logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:10, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Carl freer 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carl freer 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Looks properly licensed as the work of uploader User:Truthmaker1, but a previous version, File:Carl freer.jpg, also uploaded by Truthmaker1 and by now deleted for a lack of licensing, was claimed to be copyrighted by Carl Freer. In addition, an IP editor added the image to the article, also claiming to hold the copyright. I can't tell whether Carl Freer, User:Truthmaker1 and User:71.129.165.118 are one, two or three people and which of them, if anybody, holds the copyright. I've asked Truthmaker1 for comment; he hasn't yet replied. Huon (talk) 20:14, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MELLOLEITAO.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:MELLOLEITAO.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Description sounds like user retouched a picture that he didn't own and then claimed copyright in the retouched version. Selket ^Talk 20:37, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Early photgraph of CambridgeBayWeather.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Canada isn't the USA and the default position as regards this class of work seems to be that the subject, and not the photographer, owns the copyrights and that a contract would be required to reverse this. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:57, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Early photgraph of CambridgeBayWeather.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Professional studio portrait with no copyright release allowing for its copy and display here. Imzadi 1979 → 20:39, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Avrillavigne tbdtour.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Avrillavigne tbdtour.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image of performance. Uploader is not likely copyright holder of the performance -- the same image was deleted from Commons. Selket ^Talk 21:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Avril lavignefestival.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Avril lavignefestival.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image of concert with no fair use rationale. Selket ^Talk 21:02, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.