Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 October 8

< October 7	October 9 >

October 8

File:Intro vray0270.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Intro vray0270.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Logo of an organization Eeekster (talk) 02:07, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Logo glass.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo glass.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Organization's logo Eeekster (talk) 02:08, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:ICS campus.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:ICS campus.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

I'm not exactly sure about the copyright status of the source from whence the image was brought about; it doesn't specify. There is also primarily the image of the logo for "International Christian School" building. I would like some clarification as to whether or not the file in question is free. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 09:23, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Logo of International Christian School of Budapest.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File licensed under fair use. — ξ ^xplicit 07:16, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo of International Christian School of Budapest.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Logo of an organization; whether or not the organization chose to release the logo under the given license is disputable; the source also lacks licensing information. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 09:30, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:New York Times - Eddie August Schneider crash article.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, file is tagged as non-free. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 10:40, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:New York Times - Eddie August Schneider crash article.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

1940 newspapaper article from New York Times (text and image) being used under the claim that copyright was not renewed. No evidence is presented to substantiate that copyright was not renewed, and we can't presume. There is a fair use image in the article, File:Schneider-EddieAugust 1930 circa.jpg, so this should not be converted to fair use. (Note: Uploader not directly notified; subject of a CCI and is advised of and watching the investigation page.) Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:43, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The photograph is credited to AP. No sign of AP in the 1968 & 1969 photographic &c renewals, which are conveniently available as a PDF here ('68) and here ('69). No sign either of the daily issues of the NYT being renewed in those years. Not renewed seems plausible, but as always absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:10, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:13, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Schneider-Eddie undated.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schneider-Eddie undated.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

1930 newspapaper article, paper unidentified; text and image being used under the claim that copyright was not renewed. No evidence is presented to substantiate that copyright was not renewed, and we can't presume. There is a fair use image in the article, File:Schneider-EddieAugust 1930 circa.jpg, so this should not be converted to fair use. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:43, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Springtn.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Springtn.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Uploader claims that the file is licensed under the GFDL and cc-by-sa, but the summary says: "school website". So the picture was probably copied of the school website, which is unlikely to be under a free license. Acather96 (talk) 17:37, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Duncreg.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Duncreg.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

See above Acather96 (talk) 17:39, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Lhscrest.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lhscrest.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

School crest, very unlikely that this has been released under the GFDL or CC-BY-SA, description even states it is from the school website. Acather96 (talk) 17:53, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:FCcrest.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:FCcrest.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

See above Acather96 (talk) 17:54, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:USRA-Houston building.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:44, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:USRA-Houston building.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Claimed CC-BY-SA (self), though the description reads:

"The Lunar and Planetary Institute owns this photo" Acather96 (talk) 19:15, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Re-tardy.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:13, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Re-tardy.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Source site gives no indication that this is released under Creative Commons. Statement in the "permission" field is cryptic and seems meaningless to me. (ESkog)^(Talk) 20:31, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok left the {{|cc-by-sa-3.0|}} and added a {{|Non-free fair use in|Talk:GM6001|}} It does not fall into one of the blanket acceptable non-free content categories listed at Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images or Wikipedia:Non-free content#Audio clips. However, it is believed that the use of this work in the article "Talk:GM6001" :

To illustrate the (confusing) subject in question more better. Permission will read: Other restrictions may apply.Emissrto (talk) 22:40, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:52, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:BarunSobti1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, file is tagged as non-free. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 10:40, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:BarunSobti1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Extremely confusing image tagging to wade through. Image is sourced to some other wiki's upload directory, rather than an original source. While non-free rationales are attempted, it is also claimed, without proof, to be GFDL. At any rate, this is not author-created, and since it depicts a living person it should be deleted as a replaceable (probably) non-free image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 20:49, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:52, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Gaelic Athletic Association.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep (withdrawn). Magog the Ogre (talk) 12:04, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gaelic Athletic Association.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Fasach Nua (talk · contribs) has marked this PD-Ireland without proper explanation [1]. Used since the 1990s; the PD-Ireland tag sure doesn't explain why this PD. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:48, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am unable to comment on the template's usage over the past ten years. However the logo dates from at the latest 1924 (see here), making it a corporate work over 70 years old. If this user has an issue with the template, I suggest that it is raised on the template talk page, or takes the issue to wp:tfd Fasach Nua (talk) 21:40, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:File_name.ext

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace "Image_name.ext" with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put your reason for deletion just after "reason=". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:PUF or at my talk page. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:52, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:File name.ext (delete | talk | history | logs).

reason Emissrto (talk) 23:43, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Start the Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2010_October_8_(data page)&action=edit article, using the Article Wizard if you wish, or add a request for it. Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name File:Re-tardy.png.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.