Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 June 6
June 6
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:48, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Declined speedy; I doubt that this is "self-made" or CC licensed... it looks a bit to professional and is of low resolution. It also lacks metadata. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:16, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:48, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Same as the last one. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:22, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:48, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Same as the last one. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:22, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:48, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Same as the last one. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:23, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:48, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Source is pretty uninformative; a direct link would be helpful. Orphaned and of low enough resolution that I'm not sure that it would be useful anyway. GFDL status doubted due to image resolution and lack of metadata. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:48, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:25, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Source was given as "N-Dubz's official myspace" until its replaceability was called into question, at which point the uploader changed the story to claim that it was his/her own work. Obviously, this is dubious. (ESkog)(Talk) 03:54, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:25, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of permissions, template does not state what the conditions are Guy0307 (talk) 04:46, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:25, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
License stated as cc-by-sa, but flickr source states "All rights reserved" Radiant chains (talk) 11:21, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Lake Jazhinca in the Sharr Mountains. On an elevation of 2,180m it has a length of 150m and a width of 90m.jpg
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Kept. Clearly taken from an airplane, based on user's other uploads. —Bkell (talk) 04:39, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like a Google Earth photo. Stifle (talk) 15:05, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It has EXIF data though. ViperSnake151 Talk 16:54, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. See also File:Sharr Mountains. Luboten 2,498m, Tumba 2,346m, Maja e Livadhit 2,497, Gotushuva, Shtërpca and Brezovica Village.jpg, which was uploaded by the same user, was clearly taken from an airplane, is of the same resolution, and has the same metadata (including the same date). I think these images are OK. —Bkell (talk) 04:22, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- In fact, since I don't see any evidence that it's from Google Earth other than the fact that it's an aerial photo, I'm going to be bold and close this discussion. —Bkell (talk) 04:39, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:25, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Derivative work of film poster. Stifle (talk) 15:06, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:25, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Seems unlikely that the uploader has the right to release this as PD. Stifle (talk) 15:06, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Keep, now tagged as non-free. Take to WP:FFD if deletion is still wanted. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 03:03, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
User is unlikely to have the right to release this as public domain. Stifle (talk) 15:51, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
--Mikecrush (talk) 18:14, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Stifle...
I've just started working with Wikipedia and apologise for perhaps not getting the conventions right first time !
I have now added a Non-free symbol tag with a completed Non-free use rationale. I have also substantially reduced the resolution of the graphic representing the Unit Badge/Emblem of No 1 AEF whilst based at RAF Manston in Kent. This Unit Badge is of historic significance as No. 1 AEF disbanded at RAF Manston in 1995. The original Badge/Emblem was designed by the staff of No. 1 AEF at the time. I was a member of No. 1 AEF staff.
Please reconsider the continuing use of this graphic within the article I have authored.
Kind regards...
Mike.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:25, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt this was taken last year. Low resolution, younger members look the same age, had a strange border, no meta-data. I suspect this image was taken from another website without permission. J Milburn (talk) 19:28, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Speedied under WP:CSD#F9. There was a clear Associated Press watermark in the corner; the user made no claim to be the copyright holder or the photographer. —Bkell (talk) 04:27, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Watermarked AP, low-res, seems unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder. Stifle (talk) 20:24, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:25, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted under two other titles, unlikely the uploader is the copyright holder. Stifle (talk) 20:29, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.