Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 5
July 5
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The Flickr source page contains images from a very large variety of sources, and this one is claimed to be ARR anyway. Either way, probably a copyvio. J Milburn (talk) 09:52, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Very inconsistent sourcing, I doubt this is public domain in the source country, let alone the US. J Milburn (talk) 09:55, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image is clearly a lot younger than that. J Milburn (talk) 10:06, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No information on author or date, no way to verify PD claim. J Milburn (talk) 10:08, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Very vague source information, no way to verify PD claim. J Milburn (talk) 10:10, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
She was born in the '40s, image is clearly younger than claimed. J Milburn (talk) 10:11, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt a photo so young will be PD. J Milburn (talk) 10:11, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt such a young image is in the public domain. J Milburn (talk) 10:12, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Credits within image suggest this is a copyvio. J Milburn (talk) 10:28, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded with a batch of images that included live shots, album covers and publicity photo, all claimed own work. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 10:48, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded with a batch of images that included live shots, album covers and publicity photo, all claimed own work. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 10:48, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded with a batch of images that included live shots, album covers and publicity photo, all claimed own work. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 10:48, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded with a batch of images that included live shots, album covers and publicity photo, all claimed own work. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 10:49, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded with a batch of images that included live shots, album covers and publicity photo, all claimed own work. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 10:49, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded with a batch of images that included live shots, album covers and publicity photo, all claimed own work. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 10:49, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded with a batch of images that included live shots, album covers and publicity photo, all claimed own work. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 10:49, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded with a batch of images that included live shots, album covers and publicity photo, all claimed own work. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 10:49, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded with a batch of images that included live shots, album covers and publicity photo, all claimed own work. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 10:49, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded with a batch of images that included live shots, album covers and publicity photo, all claimed own work. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 10:49, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded with a batch of images that included live shots, album covers and publicity photo, all claimed own work. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 10:50, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:45, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by User:CoxBv under a suspect claim of being self-made photo, since it lacks any metatag information, it is provided in a pretty small size (which is quite unusual for these kinds of pictures) and, most importantly, comes from a user with a questionable upload history (two uploads who later turned out to be copyright violations). Angelo (talk) 13:44, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
While I dont doubt the uploader did take this photo, I wonder if the license is appropriate here. While taken in a public place, this is a screen shot of proprietary software. It's use in the monorail article certainly meets the requirements "significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic" but would this image require some sort of a release by the software developer (WED)? RadioFan (talk) 16:11, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This is kind of tricky. The underlying software is obviously copyrighted, but being a touch-screen the interface is a functional object and not a creative work (compare to the image of the original control panel in the article). IronGargoyle (talk) 19:08, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- In absense of clear free use here, shouldn't it be removed? Is there someone with more copyright expertise that can shed more light?--RadioFan (talk) 23:07, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think it should be deleted or removed in any case. I think a legitimate case for fair use could be made if the image is determined to be unfree. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:58, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- In absense of clear free use here, shouldn't it be removed? Is there someone with more copyright expertise that can shed more light?--RadioFan (talk) 23:07, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Retagged as fair use - I will nominate it for deletion at IFD --B (talk) 03:53, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:22, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like a logo. I doubt it is released under a CC license. J Milburn (talk) 17:36, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The image of the manuscript behind the text of the logo is far too old for copyright, and the text itself is far too simple. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:55, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:45, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The original uplader listed a rationale with a statement from the creator "You absolutely have my permission! What an honor it will be to have my photo showing on Gackt's Wikipedia entry!" It appears the creator may not have wished / known about use on wikipedia involving general free licensing [1] and has added copyright claims. -- The Red Pen of Doom 18:06, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
![[1]](/w/index.php?title=File%3AGackt_2007kenshinkousai.jpg&diff=237778696&oldid=237542946){kind=link}
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:45, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Album cover, I doubt it has been released under a free license. Unused. J Milburn (talk) 20:36, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:23, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Clearly an old image, I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this file. J Milburn (talk) 23:26, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The image is a pubicity image which was produced for distribution. It was taken during the '60 while Julia was in a Soap opera called Compact by the BBC. However Julia continued to use it as a general publicity shot for many years. Not only is this images meant for distribution but I also have the subject's explicit permission to use it. BuildArk (talk) 16:55, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.