Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wordsmithing

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:47, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wordsmithing

Wikipedia is not a dictionary Ryan Norton ^{T | @ | C} 18:04, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Note - this now exists on Two pages

Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Wordsmithing and Wikipedia:Pages for deletion/Wordsmithing

move to wikitionary wikipedia may not be a dictionary, but it does link to one...HoratioVitero 18:10, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wiktionary already contains a perfectly good entry for this. --Alan Au 18:12, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. per nom. Alf 19:44, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per above - Tεx τ urε 21:05, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Cje 08:46, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.