Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Without a Trace

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was } Disappear. >Radiant< 09:01, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Without a Trace

Very inactive project. Over a month with no activity. It's been listed on the proposed projects page for the same exact time: no interest in it as well. RobJ1981 06:04, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. We really need a better way to discourage these kinds of WikiProjects. -- Ned Scott 06:09, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per RobJ1981 & Ned Scott. ^{Well Drawn} Charli e 08:59, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - should be deleted without a trace. BhaiSaab ^talk 04:36, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete = dead project, no contributors. feydey 22:55, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Dar-Ape 18:44, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Be gone without a trace. (per above). --Arnzy (talk · contribs) 07:24, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it w/o leaving any trace. - Mailer Diablo 16:35, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Although I'd probably agree, it was kinda mean sending it to MfD, considering I can't find any trace (no pun intended) of any MfD banner on the project page. Maybe I'm missing something, but I can't see one. Due to this, Smartyshoe, may not have a chance to voice his opinion. he also seems like a newish member, so he probably wouldn't visit here very often to check. I think that a notice to the project or to Smartyshoe would have been better advised, stating how he could have gotten more members to the project & how to get it in full swing. For example, someone could have mentioned placing a post on the community portal notice board. Then if there was still not action from the member(s), then the right action would be to send it here. Deletionists always jump the gun... Spawn Man 04:48, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Dang, you're right. Well, I guess we could extend the MfD so that it runs the full time with the MfD notice? -- Ned Scott 05:10, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Although, Smartyshoe was notified of the MfD on the same day [1], and no other participants have been listed. -- Ned Scott 05:15, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd be happy with a MfD extention. Just to be fair & all. And since we're all sticklers for policy (or else pages like this wouldn't exsist!) then I guess that placing the banner is a compulsory action when nominating an article for deletion... Spawn Man 05:25, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.