Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Tool

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep as a project with past activity that might be revived. Currently tagged as inactive. No prejudice against converting into a task force of a broader project, but that is left to editorial discretion. --RL0919 (talk) 20:00, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Tool

Sub pages

Project started in 2008 and lasted about a year. Had 16 members, but discussions were largely circulars from non-members. Arguably nothing worth keeping. (There are two subpages, Wikipedia:WikiProject Tool/Collaboration of the Month, Wikipedia:WikiProject Tool/Assessment)--Klein zach 08:26, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, nothing worth saving here. Also make sure all subpages are deleted. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 13:06, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as tagged. Nothing requiring deletion. Worthy of revival. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:02, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Coherent whole, capable of being revived - pretty much per SmokeyJoe. Orderinchaos 09:28, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Change to task force per special:relatedchanges/Template:Tool (band). Kayau Voting IS evil 14:13, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Why delete it when interest could be restored at some point? Pre-made project. Lara 16:47, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Tag with template:dormant or template:inactive. Tool are notable enough that there is a reasonable likelihood of >2 editors at some time in the future getting together to work on articles. There is no nothing to be gained by deleting this. Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:42, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - No real need for deletion... and may in the future become active again. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 04:46, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Inactivity is not a delete rationale. Redirect to bigger project, if desired. Mlm42 (talk) 01:47, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Non-starter project. MoondogCoronation (talk) 11:08, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I don't see any critical need to delete this project; as has been noted, it could easily be picked up and revived. And, what's this? An attempted revival? I trust User:Jennavecia to get things moving again. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 14:13, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Per Kayau support Change to task force of Metal. Single band/artist projects are not sustainable, as shown by music project statistics. --Klein zach 00:29, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, or change to taskforce.—indopug (talk) 02:30, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.