Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Troll Warning

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was userfy the original humourous message and delete the resulting redirect. —C.Fred (talk) 17:13, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Troll Warning (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Unnecessary warning page. MikeWazowski (talk) 21:42, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Read the box. It. Is. Funny. And essays are not deleted just because one user thinks they are unnecessary. This is just as necessary as WP:Don't delete the main page, given that the main page is not deletable anymore.  --Bowser the Storm Tracker  Chat Me Up 21:50, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We'll leave that up to others to decide - it's already been speedy deleted once. MikeWazowski (talk) 21:55, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That was a misunderstanding about the intent of the article, not a valid speedying. And the other thing is, this provides legitimate ADVICE to people dealing with trolls on wikipedia or elsewhere.  --Bowser the Storm Tracker  Chat Me Up 21:57, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The whole point of the page is to present the transcript of a copyrighted video in its entirety with no original content or commentary. It is a copyright violation. jorgenev 06:00, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure that letters, a computer generated sound, and simple geometric shapes can actually be copyrighted. See: Threshold of originality LiteralKa (talk) 06:02, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean you're not sure letters can be copyrighted? jorgenev 06:06, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm saying that it doesn't meet the Threshold of originality. LiteralKa (talk) 06:08, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I see a paragraph of copied content. A paragraph does not meet the threshold of originality? jorgenev 06:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Guess what? THAT. IS. MY. OWN. FLIPPIN'. VIDEO. THEREFORE NO COPYVIO.  --Bowser the Storm Tracker  Chat Me Up 00:55, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If you own the video that posting it here is indeed your right. However aside from that I still !vote delete. I would recommend you move the content to your userpage. jorgenev 01:31, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Then that should have been your first response to the claims of copyright violation. Not that it was simply referenced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inks.LWC (talkcontribs)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.