Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:TourBusStop
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: keep . -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 20:56, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Ancient relic of the very early (read: UseMod) days of Wikipedia. WP:NOTWEBRING. Lojbanist remove cattle from stage 04:53, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- Strong mark as {{historical}}. No benefit is achieved by obfuscating historical parts of Wikipedia. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 04:59, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. Unpersuasive nomination. There is no problem. Deleting old things creates new problems. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:14, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- Strong historical per Godsy — pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 12:27, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep as historically interesting. If appropriate, mark as historical. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:52, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep but mark as historical- the whole webring concept is one of the more unsightly pimples from the internet's embarrassing adolescence. But we should archive, rather than delete, ancient clutter for future reference. Reyk YO! 10:46, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- I don’t think it is ugly or pimply. It is more like a 8-12 year old phase. Internet pages had become normal, and people start exploring more widely, but have no idea of the actual expanse. Like a kid exploring the neighbourhood who is unaware of distant places who may think there is only one shopping centre in existence. Webrings make sense as a firs idea. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:21, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.