Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rawr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep something lame from CBW 09:50, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rawr

tl;dr, stupid rambling nonsense, we shouldn't accept stuff like "epic. but don't ever say it to a German kid! unless you're fucking that german kid O.o" in userspace. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 02:22, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rawr self-explanatory. Gigs (talk) 02:23, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, substantial content that is unrelated to Wikipedia, per WP:UP#NOT. Blurpeace 02:37, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as per Blurpeace. SmokingNewton (talk) 03:59, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, it's my user page. If you have objections to certain entries on my page, please talk to me first instead of putting it up for deletion immediately with no warning. Rawr (talk) 19:26, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep since no one appreciated my humor. It could and probably should be pared down, but there's nothing really wrong with this user page. Rawr is an active contributor and isn't here to play games. Gigs (talk) 20:51, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Reasonable leeway. Userpages don't have to likable, but feel free to politely give User:Rawr your feedback. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:33, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Within normal leeway for userspace. If you have a problem, ask the editor to make a change. MfD is not a good place to bring it. Collect (talk) 14:35, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I do not see this userpage's content as excessive enough to constitute a WP:UP#NOT violation, though a case could be made. With active contributors, I don't see why this shouldn't be within the normal leeway for userspace. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 04:03, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, IF it is pruned of any problematic WP:BLP concerns, such as the Chuck Norris entry at the end. Other than that, its just harmless scribble. Tarc (talk) 13:53, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.