Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mevish1
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Keep--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 07:39, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
On November 23, I left this user a personalized note about my concerns regarding their user page. Since then, the content of the user page has not been altered, and the user has not replied to or acknowledged my message, although they have been active on Wikipedia. The current content of the user page is completely unrelated to the Wikipedia project and seems to serve only to promote the user's YouTube channel. Nick—Contact/Contribs 17:25, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- Keep A single line, and no link, does not quite constitute major promotion. The single line does no harm.There are well over four thousand user pages which mention youtube. And were we to only allow "material related to Wikipedia" on user pages, we would have very little use of user pages. Collect (talk) 17:39, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- Comment While I agree that a single line referencing YouTube is acceptable on someone's user page, I think that would be the case only with other content on the page. In this case, it seems to be that the only purpose of the user page as it's currently written is to promote the YouTube channel, especially considering that the user page was created after Mevish1 was deleted. --Nick—Contact/Contribs 17:54, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- But it was appropriate for the user to create this page after Mevish1 was deleted. The content was not acceptable in the mainspace, but it is acceptable for the userspace. With no link to the YouTube page, the level of promotion involved here is so low that it's not worth worrying about. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:45, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- Comment While I agree that a single line referencing YouTube is acceptable on someone's user page, I think that would be the case only with other content on the page. In this case, it seems to be that the only purpose of the user page as it's currently written is to promote the YouTube channel, especially considering that the user page was created after Mevish1 was deleted. --Nick—Contact/Contribs 17:54, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per WP:BITE and WP:EM. There isn't even a link on this user page to the editor's YouTube channel. Furthermore, after creating their user page, the editor has gone on to focus on editing the mainspace of the encyclopedia. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 08:13, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- There are some copyright concerns. They copied the image for Britney Spear's fragrance Believe from http://www.parfummafia.com/mm5/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&Store_Code=P&Category_Code=womens-fragrances which means it's highly likely they did not in fact made the image themselves, which puts all their images under scrutiny. They've also uploaded screenshots of videos. - Mgm|(talk) 15:08, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- Per your request on my UT page, are you saying that the images uploaded by the user (not to their user page) are directly relevant to the issue of their user page being deleted? Thanks! Collect (talk) 14:16, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- Per your request on my user talk page, I would ask the same question as Collect. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:35, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- Per your request on my UT page, are you saying that the images uploaded by the user (not to their user page) are directly relevant to the issue of their user page being deleted? Thanks! Collect (talk) 14:16, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.