Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Maintenance script

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 14:14, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Maintenance script

This is a soft redirect to the script's Meta user page, requiring the user to click to view it. However, the script has a global user page, meaning that the soft redirect is not needed, and may be inefficient. JJP_{Mas_ter} (she/they) 05:20, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep, for the category. I'm open to other ways of doing this though. This page was created in May 2015, *after* global user pages became available in February 2015. Graham87 (talk) 00:53, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe we could add the category to the user talk page instead; there are no global user talk pages. JJP_{Mas_ter} (she/they) 14:58, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- That'd work for me. Graham87 (talk) 06:53, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Makes things actively worse for the sake of including a category of only questionable applicability and with thousands of other entries (so it's a needle in a haystack). No thanks. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 05:03, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@JJPMaster: Agreed. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 01:15, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and add the category to the user talk page per the above discussion.—Alalch E. 12:56, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.