Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User time zone editnotice
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:12, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Editnotice created in late 2021 with no apparent adoption, unless searching doesn't find uses of editnotices. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:09, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. I created this template as a copy of Enterprisey's personal template per here. I didn't go to any special effort to promote it, so it's not surprising it hasn't been discovered yet, but it's properly categorized and fully discoverable for the future. WP:TFD#REASONS #3, which is what you're alluding to in your nomination, states
The template is not used, either directly or by template substitution (the latter cannot be concluded from the absence of backlinks), and has no likelihood of being used.
The emphasis there is original, and was presumably added for a reason. The nomination provides no argument for why thishas no likelihood of being used
—to the contrary, I think the potential use is quite clear—so I see no cause for deletion. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 16:39, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- Lack of adoption is an indicator that it is unlikely to be used; Sdkb is not even using it. I am happy to go with the consensus here. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:59, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the ping. We could also just have it on your user page or some other project-space page as a useful snippet of wikitext. Enterprisey (talk!) 19:13, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. There's no reason to expect people other than those in the unused templates task force to dredge up templates that have been rotting for months, so it's self-evidently the case that a long-unused template like this one has no likelihood of being used. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:30, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- I've just added it to the Userspace messages and disclaimers and Editnotice templates navboxes, so it's now much easier to discover. Let's give it a while to see if anyone decides to use it before declaring that there is
no likelihood
whatsoever of that happening. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 21:20, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- I've just added it to the Userspace messages and disclaimers and Editnotice templates navboxes, so it's now much easier to discover. Let's give it a while to see if anyone decides to use it before declaring that there is
- Keep for now. I am curious to see where this goes as templates can always be looked at again later down the line. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:32, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. After finding out about it from this MfD, it occurs to me that I would like to use this in my talk-page editnotice (will add as soon as the MfD notice is removed). jp×g 04:36, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I've added it now that I know it exists, despite the ugly deletion notice. Can we onlyinclude the template itself to emit transcluding the deletion notice? I don't know the rules around deletion of templates. Melmann 18:28, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Likely to be used. 2601:647:5800:1A1F:B45D:61AC:E323:660D (talk) 18:53, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, didn't know that this template exists, but now that I do I"m going to put it on my talk page in place of the userbox. Also I agree with Melmann that we should make it so that the deletion notice shouldn't be included with the template since it makes it appear like the page it's being used on is being considered for deletion here at MfD. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:47, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Thanks to the OP for letting me know about this useful template. I have as well added it to my userpage. --Jayron32 16:50, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I feel like I've looked for templates with this exact functionality before and could never find one. This template does actually look really nice and I've joined the others in adding it to my page. Maybe I shouldn't have, because now I'm showcasing how bad my schedule can be and I'm paranoid that someone's going to call me out for editing at 3 in the morning one of these days... Vanilla Wizard 💙 19:21, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- That's the only reason I'm not using it myself haha 🤣 {{u|Sdkb}} talk 22:32, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Wow, what a great way to promote a useful template! — Mcguy15 (talk, contribs) 17:43, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- I put it on my page too =). - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:09, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment - This template needs to be fixed as the displayed time does not update. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:13, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Knowledgekid87, it only updates when the page is purged; that's something common to all time templates on Wikipedia, and there's no way around it. But it should work if you use it as intended as an editnotice, rather than putting it directly on your talk page as you did in the diff above. Best, {{u|Sdkb}} talk 20:21, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.