Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Red Monkey Designs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:08, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Red Monkey Designs

Red Monkey Designs

This draft was submitted in January 2020 by Torrypendy, who is obviously Torry Pendergrass, founder of Red Monkey. I rejected it because it read like an advertisement. It also had too many non-permitted external links. It was deleted as G13 in July 2020, but was then undeleted. It was tweaked by gnomes in November 2020, which extended its shelf life. It was then deleted as G13 in May 2021, and has been undeleted again, and has been diddled with by Torrypendy and by a gnome. If a neutral editor had been planning to do real work on it, they would have done so within the past year. It isn't accomplishing anything, and should be gotten rid of. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:42, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom -- Robert knows how to write a good MfD rationale :) This is the exact use case we have draft-related MfDs for. Vaticidalprophet 01:37, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and VP. Regards, 31.41.45.190 (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, clear explanation as to why this isn't a case of WP:NMFD. — csc^-1 02:15, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.