Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Manish Kumar Pandey
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:44, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Trivial autobiography. Guy (help! - typo?) 11:45, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep That is not a valid reason for deletion at MfD, and I rather suspect this person may turn out to be notable, altyhoguyh nthe draft does not yet demonstrate that. But a draft is for editors to demonstrate, notability, if they can. it is not to be deleted just because they have not yet done so, nor is beign an autobiography a reason for deletion. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 17:06, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- It's spam. All edits by the subject, tone is pure promotion. Guy (help! - typo?) 22:24, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOTCV. Woefully fails WP:PROF, it must be deleted as promotion. It could have better been AfC rejected and left for G13. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:52, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - If the subject is notable, it is better to blow this up and start over to remove the taint of promotionalism. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:55, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: Not notable. Aasim 03:37, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Looking at the citations to their articles, there's no chance whatever it would pass AfD. DGG ( talk ) 20:14, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Weak keep in progress we assume it will not make it to main space unless approved. No chance of that right now. Wm335td (talk) 20:40, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.