Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Lauren Jenkins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Lauren Jenkins

Highly promotional draft. Subject may meet WP:NMUSIC, but this is just a big PR mouthpiece and any article about her would have to practically be written from the ground up just to be readable. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: "This draft sucks" is not a deletion rationale. It's a draft. They often suck. The point is to make them suck less. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 07:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Articleify if possible. –Cupper52^Discuss! 16:58, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This is a draft with tone problems. Do not accept until tone problems are improved. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:NMFD and those above. Has potential. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 11:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and save it for WP:G13 unless it's problems are resolved. — csc^-1 17:58, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Vaticidalprophet. Draft needs improving not deleting. –Davey2010^Talk 22:44, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and rewrite for less promotional tone. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 02:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.