Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Jack Bin
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete . — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:27, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- Draft:Jack Bin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Googlemusician/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Non notable kid musician submitting multiple drafts under multiple accounts. Not explicitly G11 worthy. CoolSkittle (talk) 11:21, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete the kid put "click here to listen..." in his sandbox, now deleted as SPAM. This is not going anywhere good. Legacypac (talk) 12:24, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - We need a word for things that need deleting because they are for or by children. The word isn't child porn because that is a very specific type of very immoral contraband. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:46, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - KIDCRUD. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:46, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- Either G11 or leave for G13. KIDCRUD should not be marched through MfD for high profile community attention. In favour of G11, it has no sources, meaning no reliable sources, meaning it has zero content suitable for reuse, which with promotion makes it G11 eligible. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:05, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- tagged G11 and if an admin does not like that I suggest IAR Legacypac (talk) 23:00, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.