Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Breakthrough Management Group International

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. There is consensus that notability of this Indian subsidiary has not been demonstrated, but there may be a possibility of an article about the parent. JohnCD (talk) 12:11, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Breakthrough Management Group International

This has, in my view, reached the end of the WP:AFC road. Multiple reviews with no hint of passing WP:CORP, certainly by this contributing editor, mean it needs to be put out of its promotional misery Fiddle Faddle 00:37, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am first time editor so it took me some time to understand the process. I believe there has been some progress in improving the article. Unfortunately, I got different advise from multiple sources which led to the delay.

As I understand, the only issue is the notability now. I wont change the content now and will add relevant 3rd party links to improve the notability. Any other suggestions are most welcome. Sujaydeo (talk) 04:59, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited the content. I have removed irrelevant links and added some relevant links. Please take a look. Your advise will be very helpful. Sujaydeo (talk) 19:02, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Right now the article is really only about BMGI India (most of the references are from Indian sources). I agree with the earliest comment, which is that the parent company would need an article first, and that most likely subsidiaries would be covered in that article, not as stand-alone articles. Unfortunately, I suspect that the creator/editor isn't in a position to create an article for the parent company, which might be a pretty complex undertaking. But instead of deleting this, I would like to introduce Sujaydeo to Wikipedia:WikiProject Companies and see if someone there would like to take on at least creating a decent beginning of an article for BMGI, after which Sujaydeo can add the relevant information about the Indian subsidiary. Looking at the references, a case could be made for writing about how the quality control issue has affected Indian businesses, and there are success stories in those references that show the impact of QC improvement. Let me see if I can stir up some interest at the Companies project. LaMona (talk) 21:01, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You Lamona. From my side, I will try to find more 3rd party links about BMGI parent company. Sujaydeo (talk) 04:23, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Improve and mainspace - 166.176.57.117 (talk) 04:55, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. 15 cites, but just a flurry of press releases, directory entries, and side mentions, none of them substantial coverage from independent, reliable sources. WP:NOTPROMO. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 13:00, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No reasonable chance of passing AfD. DGG ( talk ) 22:00, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.