Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Association of Spaceflight Professionals

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedily deleted per G5 by MaxSem and RHaworth respectively. (non-admin closure) — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 04:32, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Association of Spaceflight Professionals

Previously-deleted page re-created by IPs, simultaneous to revival of sockpuppet case. This page (Draft:Association of Spaceflight Professionals) and Draft:Tau Zero Foundation were main targets of Altman (see COI board discussion archive and SPI archive for context). They are re-created with same level of puffery (shower of affiliations, wikilinks, extlinks), never entering core of topic (what is actually done by whom), a trend familiar to those who have worked on the articles affected by this case. Ariadacapo (talk) 10:38, 5 June 2018 (UTC) Ariadacapo (talk) 10:38, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete but will be requesting Speedy Deletion due to sockpuppetry by the IPs. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:39, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Please consider speedy deletion as an alternative to MFD. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:40, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Both pages have now been speedily deleted as G5, so this the present nomination can be closed. Thank you Robert McClenon for your patience and perseverance (I was inclined to think a formal nomination was in order, but you were correct). Ariadacapo (talk) 18:49, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.