Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Book:Coke Studio (Pakistan)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was no consensus - no appeal to policy, no pressing concern with the book except that it's perhaps underdeveloped. Leaves me with a headcount, mostly, plus partially? wholly? addressed concerns. WilyD 08:17, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Too little content. Can be recreated when it's not mostly redlinks. If someone wants to userfy it in the meantime, that might be wise. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:50, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete or userfy per nom. Doesn't amount to anything now. --Kleinzach 00:20, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
- Keep as I've fixed the red links. All the articles exist. The book now has 7 articles (it was 3 at the time of this nomination). Mar4d (talk) 02:43, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
- Question Why do you want to make this book? --Kleinzach 14:28, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry for answering a question not directed at me, but I cannot see how this is not a valid community book. — This, that and the other (talk) 10:56, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
- Limited scope? Surely a book should be more than just a few articles on the same subject? --Kleinzach 08:04, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
- I don't see why it can't be. Help:Books says "Books should have a reasonable number of articles". Is seven reasonable? Definitely. It would be a useful collection of articles to download as one PDF file or order as a printed book. — This, that and the other (talk) 04:57, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
- Limited scope? Surely a book should be more than just a few articles on the same subject? --Kleinzach 08:04, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry for answering a question not directed at me, but I cannot see how this is not a valid community book. — This, that and the other (talk) 10:56, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
- Question Why do you want to make this book? --Kleinzach 14:28, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.