Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

Shortcuts

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Shortcut

WP:BEFORE

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines

The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines

B. Carry out these checks

Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.

C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted

If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.

D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability

The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.

Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
- It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
- You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.

Create a discussion page.

If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
- It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
- A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
- As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.

List it here

Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
{{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/(name of page to be deleted)}}
Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "~~Delete~~ keep".
If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.

All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

Flags of cities of the United States

Flags of cities of the United States (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I'm not really sure why this article exists, as it functions perfectly well in wikimedia. In any case, a lot of this article is outdated or incomplete, and its lede isn't even in simple english, defeating the point of having a reason for this article in the first place. At the very least, I would recommend redirecting it to the wikimedia version of the article MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 23:52, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Question -- What is the "Wikimedia" article you're referring to? CountryANDWestern (talk) 01:51, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 23:52, 7 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

List of new Philippine typhoon names

List of new Philippine typhoon names (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not really sure about this one. I don't think the list makes much sense. I also don't feel it's covered by en:WP:NLIST. Barras talk 20:47, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:47, 7 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Seez

Seez (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Reads pretty much like an ad. Doubtable notability. Barras talk 20:43, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete: best reason by nominator. Piyale Harbhajan (talk) 04:46, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: No need of deletion, need to remove promotion language. Phrases that ma come off as promotional can be rephrased to reflect a more neutral perspective. User:Leathernote 08:24, 01 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 20:43, 7 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

André Fernandes

André Fernandes (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be notable. Fails GNG Barras talk 20:39, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Administrator note: If no one sees notability on that one, it may also be deleted as G7 per Special:Diff/10430032. -Barras talk 21:27, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails GNG. Piyale Harbhajan (talk) 04:47, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails notability. User:Leathernote 08:25, 01 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 20:39, 7 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Jamia Masjid Siddique Akbar Dinpur

Jamia Masjid Siddique Akbar Dinpur (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I don't see the notability of that building per en:WP:NBUILD. Barras talk 20:35, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete: going with nominator. Piyale Harbhajan (talk) 04:48, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not meet Notability. User:Leathernotes 08:30, 01 August 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:35, 7 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Steven Balson-Cohen

Steven Balson-Cohen (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails WP:GNG --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 17:04, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete: fails gng. Piyale Harbhajan (talk) 04:49, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 17:04, 7 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Raymond Aaron

Raymond Aaron (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails WP:GNG. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Aaron back from 2009. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 17:01, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete per nom. I can only find coverage by the subject himself or of little use in establishing notability. Sophocrat (talk) 01:38, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom. Piyale Harbhajan (talk) 04:50, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 17:01, 7 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Lekar Hum Deewana Dil (TV series)

Lekar Hum Deewana Dil (TV series) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not really many reliable coverage for notability. Most of the given sources are not reliable. BRP^ever 13:13, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Merge: merge with Dangal (TV channel). Piyale Harbhajan (talk) 04:52, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 13:13, 7 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Central Park birdwatching incident

Central Park birdwatching incident (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Bobherry has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: per WP:NOT, article is written like a news article. It does not state why this event is important or encyclopedic. Bobherry Talk My Changes 02:21, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

We should re-write it in a way that it does not look like a news article. This is an important event in American Racism history, and we ought to record this piece of history for the sake of the African Americans. Malairen (talk) 03:16, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:BEFORE C1: If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 11:10, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 02:21, 7 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Talk:H/doc

Talk:H/doc (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Zinnober9 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Page created in error. I don't see any connection to it being related to any template, and just seems as a accidental subpage of Talk:H. The IP who created it doesn't seem to have an idea that documentation template/pages are for templates as they also added an empty template documentation to the article H for some reason (I've since reverted). Zinnober9 (talk) 21:51, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:51, 6 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Heyva Sor hospital massacre

Heyva Sor hospital massacre (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I don't think this is a hoax or not notable, tbh. However, I'm unable to really verify this. The sources use other names and g-search doesn't come up with much on that article's name. Barras talk 10:34, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete: per nom. Piyale Harbhajan (talk) 04:55, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 10:34, 6 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Great Firewall

Great Firewall (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is a soft redirect to an English Wiktionary article. I don’t believe we should be soft redirecting to another project like this in the main space. CountryANDWestern (talk) 00:17, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Accessory. Yilangderen (talk) 00:28, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There's a difference between a soft redirect to a Simple English Wiktionary and an English Wiktionary. The Simple English Wiktionary is a "sister" project to this one. Further, we use the soft redirect to Simple's Wiktionary for words that will never be encyclopedia articles but need to be defined for readers. This topic COULD be an article so a soft redirect to any Wiktionary wouldn't be appropriate. CountryANDWestern (talk) 00:36, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Although this isn't about notability, other stuff exists and can be eligible for deletion too. This isn't an apples for apples case, and I'm not sure many people are too keen on those Wiktionary soft redirects anyway - the whole Wiktionary soft redirect template was accidentally created in a mass-import and just adjusted and used from there. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:50, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in RfD discussions May I ask, is the "other stuff exist" guideline in the simple English page? Yilangderen (talk) 02:42, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Soft redirects tend to be pretty common in SEWP. In this case, this page was likely made because the author didn't want to create an article, so they just linked the page to wiktionary, but since Simple Wiktionary didn't have a word about that, they just used English Wiktionary. In general, I would suggest having a greater discussion on soft redirects before deleting this one. MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 10:07, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t think we need to have a greater conversation about them as this one is unique so we can just focus on its circumstances in this RFD. Unless there is anything mislabeled out there, this is the only redirect to English Wiktionary in Category:Redirects to Wiktionary (which was a surprisingly smaller category than I anticipated). And, unless I missed one, there are no main space articles soft redirecting to anywhere in Category:Wikipedia soft redirects. So, as far as I can see, this is the only main space soft redirect to a non Simple project. CountryANDWestern (talk) 10:22, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is such a great opportunity for an actual article I think. I don't see this topic as appropriate for a Wiktionary entry, particularly not in Simple English Wiktionary. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:53, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or change to dab. We often say that we use red links to tell us what articles we need to create. If anything links to this kind of soft redirect, it won't show up as a red link. Therefore, I don't think we should have redirects to Wiktionary if there's any possibility, however remote, that the term could be an article. --Auntof6 (talk) 14:16, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 00:17, 6 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Chandrani Das

Chandrani Das (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails w:en:WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandrani Das. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:56, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete: per nom. Piyale Harbhajan (talk) 04:58, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 22:56, 5 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Chandra Kafle

Chandra Kafle (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails WP:GNG --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:53, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete: fails GNG. Piyale Harbhajan (talk) 04:59, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- We need more citations. Darrenchant (talk) 07:57, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The provided citations don't show notability. Four are just his poems/stories in online places to publish literary works. The other two news articles are tough to determine their reliability and whether or not they clearly show he is notable. CountryANDWestern (talk) 10:41, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete spam, could be speedy deleted --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 11:02, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails wp:GNG --Cactus🌵 ^hi ^ツ 06:31, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 22:53, 5 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Rzon (producer)

Rzon (producer) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not shown through significant coverage in reliable sources. Many of these articles are about his songs being released and don't seem to be significant coverage of his work. A lot are about the artists he worked with and not about him. CountryANDWestern (talk) 21:51, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete: per nom. Piyale Harbhajan (talk) 05:00, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 21:51, 5 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Sundeep Kochar

Sundeep Kochar (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doubtable notability. See enwiki deletion of the article. Barras talk 13:06, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Quick Delete: unnotable. Piyale Harbhajan (talk) 05:01, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 13:06, 5 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ruben Chorlton-Owen

Ruben Chorlton-Owen (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Cactusisme has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: no signs of notability Cactus🌵 ^hi ^ツ 09:30, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Ruben Chorlton-Owen is notable due to significant national and international media coverage following a widely publicised health incident linked to a hair transplant in Turkey. His story was featured in major, reliable publications including the New York Post, The Mirror, The Sun, LADbible, WalesOnline, Manchester Evening News, Daily Star, Birmingham Mail, Cambrian News, Plymouth Herald, Cornwall Live, and UNILAD, among others. These outlets are all editorially independent and are recognised as reliable sources by Wikipedia standards. The coverage was not trivial; it focused on a unique post-surgery complication and was syndicated across multiple countries, making Ruben one of the most widely reported UK individuals in a viral lifestyle and health story in July 2025. The level of independent attention demonstrates lasting notability, fulfilling Wikipedia’s general notability guideline. The article is encyclopedic in tone and relevance, particularly for Simple English Wikipedia, which documents individuals with broad public recognition in simplified language for accessibility. AuditofMedia (talk) 09:54, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 09:30, 5 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Rashaun L. Williams

Rashaun L. Williams (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be notable. Fails GNG. Barras talk 22:33, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete: Fails GNG, Unnotable. Piyale Harbhajan (talk) 05:02, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete can't find significant coverage of him, accomplished but not notable fr33k man 22:47, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 22:33, 4 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Scienticide

Scienticide (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

65.76.141.133 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is a poorly composed article created to push a point of view. It unfairly equates killing scientists, destruction of property, and advocating anti-science messages. 65.76.141.133 (talk) 22:09, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete is what i am leaning toward. POV article? Maybe.--En-wiki's article links to no wiki-articles (on their project), if asked.--Note: i added the language-link 'to the En-wiki article', so that anyone could compare our article with En-wiki's article (which is c. a half-year old).--I think that the loss (or Delete), will be a win for our project. 2001:2020:359:B9D1:8070:5837:40D7:C573 (talk) 03:00, 29 July 2025 (UTC) /2001:2020:359:B9D1:8070:5837:40D7:C573 (talk) 03:00, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Subject is not merely a recent neologism. It has been used extensively in reliable sources like Science (AAAS), Nature, and Euronews to describe real-world policy issues such as the suppression of science in Argentina. The concept has been discussed internationally and satisfies WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. Darrenchant (talk) 08:25, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - If the article (still) is not ready to stay in an encyclopedia, by the time this discussion will be decided, then Delete should likely be the result.--Note: if this article gets Kept, then 'it would be reasonable, that i ask that the en-wiki article gets Deleted' (and then Simple-wiki might thereafter have its 'round number two at RFD'); As long as all of that is not a violation of rules and wiki-guidelines. 2001:2020:359:B9D1:495F:4552:3738:A7DA (talk) 12:08, 30 July 2025 (UTC) /2001:2020:359:B9D1:8070:5837:40D7:C573[reply]
Delete: per nom. Piyale Harbhajan (talk) 05:03, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 22:09, 4 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Lynsey Calver

Lynsey Calver (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Subject does not appear to have converge from reliable sources. Fails Wikipedia:Notability (people) Ternera (talk) 15:05, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete - not notable. -Barras talk 19:27, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: not notable article. Piyale Harbhajan (talk) 05:04, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 15:05, 4 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Neeru Yadav

Neeru Yadav (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Procedural nomination -- This was tagged as an RFD by User:CharlieMehta in May but they did not complete the steps. I am completing the steps for them as I believe it should be considered for deletion. They attempted to nominate it with the following rationale: This is a spam topic and had problems before on the English Wikipedia. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:33, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Quick Delete: Sarpanch is unnotable position. Piyale Harbhajan (talk) 05:09, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 12:33, 4 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

List of India men's international cricketers

List of India men's international cricketers (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: m:Template:Looks useless to me. The list has on former and one active person. The introduction to the section is far away from being encyclopedic. Barras talk 21:53, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Quick Delete: per nom. Piyale Harbhajan (talk) 05:10, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 21:53, 3 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Silent Night (Sixpence None the Richer song)

Silent Night (Sixpence None the Richer song) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Song doesn't seem to be notable per WP:GNG and also no WP:SIGCOV. Barras talk 21:33, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Quick Delete: Single line article. Piyale Harbhajan (talk) 05:11, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 21:33, 3 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Roberto Panciatici

Roberto Panciatici (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Reads like a fan page or autobiography. Doesn't seem to be notable. G-search doesn't reveal much except his own pages. WP:SIGCOV. Barras talk 20:56, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete: per nom. Piyale Harbhajan (talk) 05:13, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 20:56, 3 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

2027 Formula One World Championship

2027 Formula One World Championship (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:CRYSTAL. Article has been deleted and salted on enwiki. I suggest the same for here. See en:2027_Formula_One_World_Championship. Barras talk 09:45, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete - No references can be found. Should be Deleted. Darrenchant (talk) 07:56, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom. Piyale Harbhajan (talk) 05:14, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 09:45, 3 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Brenda Jensen

Brenda Jensen (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unlikely to meet WP:GNG or any other notability criteria. BRP^ever 04:05, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Can you please tell me why this page nominated for deletion. What should I need to add in this page? Brenda A Jensen (talk) 20:54, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Quick Delete: Fails GNG. Piyale Harbhajan (talk) 05:14, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable, no significant coverage, nothing on Google news or scholar, clearly fails GNG and COI fr33k man 21:00, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Fr33kman. Notability not established. CountryANDWestern (talk) 18:07, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- Does not meet notability. Can't find anything reliable.Darrenchant (talk) 07:52, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 04:05, 3 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

David urban arévalo

David urban arévalo (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Sir Banking has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unclear how this is a notable writer Sir Banking (talk) 11:43, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can I know the reason for the deletion please? Samsonexperts (talk) 17:36, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can I know the reason for the deletion please? Samsonexperts (talk) 20:35, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

sir banking, this is a notable writer Marie20123 (talk) 06:35, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Quick Delete: per nom. Piyale Harbhajan (talk) 05:17, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 11:43, 1 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The Kigerrous Cartoon ( 1967 Cartoon)

The Kigerrous Cartoon ( 1967 Cartoon) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Midtvu has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: There is no evidence that this cartoon exists. There is also no structure to the article, just listing off charcters. This 'cartoon' seems to be either a hoax, or completely made up. Sorry about any inconveniences, MidTV (talk) 05:03, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete as it seems to be a hoax. In the last few days there has been an unusually high number of obvious hoax articles like this one. I wonder if there's a particular vandal behind it. Sophocrat (talk) 22:28, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Quick Delete: looks hoax. Piyale Harbhajan (talk) 05:18, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 05:03, 30 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Nábéel Sháikh (Entrepreneur)

Nábéel Sháikh (Entrepreneur) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not shown through significant coverage in reliable sources CountryANDWestern (talk) 11:08, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete - that is what i am leaning toward. Not notable. 2001:2020:359:B9D1:191A:1E62:6A2A:3B87 (talk) 13:22, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete subject does not have coverage from reliable sources. Ternera (talk) 14:07, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Does not meet notability. Can't find anything reliable. Darrenchant (talk) 08:39, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: not enough coverage. Piyale Harbhajan (talk) 05:20, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 11:08, 2 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Bukenya Sulaiman

Bukenya Sulaiman (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails notability. Barras talk 14:47, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete - that is what i am leaning toward. Not notable.--No info or refs at en-wiki, if asked. 2001:2020:359:B9D1:182B:B97B:D65B:FCAD (talk) 16:34, 25 July 2025 (UTC) /2001:2020:359:B9D1:182B:B97B:D65B:FCAD (talk) 19:12, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep:

I've established that the Subject clearly meets Wikipedia’s notability standards, with significant coverage from multiple independent and reliable sources, including Monitor (Uganda’s most credible daily), Nile Post, Uganda Times, and Watchdog News. His documented impact makes the article verifiable and encyclopedic.Edibiz (talk) 19:00, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The subject exceeds the basic notability requirements. 41.210.159.196 (talk) 11:18, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: not notable. Piyale Harbhajan (talk) 05:22, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 14:47, 1 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ram Fish

Ram Fish (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be a notable person. Barras talk 14:15, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete. Fails GNG. Piyale Harbhajan (talk) 05:24, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 14:15, 1 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Heartbound (video game)

Heartbound (video game) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Pppery has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No evidence of notability. Deleted on enwiki for that reason. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:15, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Keep HeartBound is an actual game on steam. Not a good one, but a real one.

https://store.steampowered.com/app/567380/Heartbound Sorry about any inconveniences, MidTV (talk) 10:37, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I am not sufficiently convinced there's enough coverage in WP:RS to warrant keeping it. Hiàn 00:20, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 23:15, 31 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Joy Organics

Joy Organics (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Bobherry has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Potentionally fails notablity requirements Bobherry Talk My Changes 19:57, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

KEEP: I am the creator. I created this because it's one of the better known CBD companies and didn't have a page. I have posted 11 citations for them. 4 are articles about them, 5 are reviews and 2 are listicles (maybe not in-depth), but it provides evidence that they are Top 10 CBD product/company. Zazzledazz (talk) 07:50, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Meets notability based on news coverage in 1, 2, 3 and 4 Darrenchant (talk) 07:59, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable and reads like an advertisment. Article has been deleted on enwiki, see en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joy Organics. -Barras talk 09:30, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
(change conflict) Delete Nowhere near to passing GNG. Addressing the sources in the comment above: 1/Reporter Herald is local coverage, potentially promotion, + 2/Coloradoan too - this is just local routine coverage of a store opening which doesn't demonstrate notability at all, per w:en:WP:AUD. 3/Supermarket News and 4/Medical News Today also feel promotional and based off of quotes from the store owner. Conveniently also nominated for deletion on enwiki in w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joy Organics where many of these arguments were already bought up and countered. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 09:34, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 19:57, 30 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Dissolution of Soran Emirate

Dissolution of Soran Emirate (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: We don't have an article about Soran Emirate, into which the content could possibly be merged. The article reads not really neutral. Our article shows up first on a quick g-search. Don't feel this article should stay. Barras talk 22:04, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Note - the article was moved to End of the Soran Dynasty and significantly edited since this RFD opened. CountryANDWestern (talk) 01:34, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 22:04, 29 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Barras talk 17:01, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Sulaymaniyah (1678)

Battle of Sulaymaniyah (1678) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:V. Sources provided are either too vague (just author last name and page number or year), do not match with the ISBN provided, or do not seem to contain the information. Google searches do not assist here. I note that this is a translation of the article from the Azerbaijani Wikipedia where it was created by a globally locked user who created hoaxes on En. and was socking here on Simple. CountryANDWestern (talk) 00:19, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Quick Delete under A6. Search turns up no results as well as page has previously been deleted under A6. I also suggest a possible SPI or an admin check the previous deleted pages contents against the current. Bobherry Talk My Changes 02:13, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 00:19, 7 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Barras talk 17:00, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Erbil 1991

Battle of Erbil 1991 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asilvering has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Previous editor forgot to create this discussion page. Their reason for the nomination was: "This article appears to he created by AI/LLM, and most of the sources does not mention Erbil. So it's hoax." asilvering (talk) 03:24, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete We have a general problem with Battle of XXX articles. I guess quite a few of them should be deleted or merged into a more general article. -Barras talk 12:15, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 03:24, 1 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:57, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dogar

Dogar (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, all four sources only briefly mention the Dogar clan. MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 15:12, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Keep: Article are with reliable sources and Qualified for GNG. Harbhajan Piyale (talk) 02:38, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The source needs significant coverage, meaning that the topic is discussed in detail. None of the sources extensively cover the Dogar clan. MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 10:13, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete agree with the nom. -Barras talk 13:19, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 15:12, 31 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:56, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jibril Abdullahi Sirajo

Jibril Abdullahi Sirajo (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: As senior adviser the person fails to be notable. Barras talk 15:02, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 15:02, 31 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:55, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pipara / pipada rajput

Pipara / pipada rajput (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Harbhajan Piyale has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Totally unsourced, looks hoax article. Harbhajan Piyale (talk) 10:34, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete per nom. -Barras talk 13:03, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 10:34, 31 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. A7 Barras talk 13:20, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Maidan Morik

Battle of Maidan Morik (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: RFD added by Enegmo (talk · contribs) with the following reason: AI/LLM generated and hoax. Barras talk 21:18, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Quick Delete I wouldn't ordinarily do this, but given the reason for deletion here is a QD reason, I've nominated it for A7 deletion. It's awaiting an endorsement and uninvolved admin. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 10:01, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 21:18, 2 August 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Barras talk 13:17, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mekan clan

Mekan clan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Harbhajan Piyale has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Stands on unreliable sources, looks copy-pasted. Harbhajan Piyale (talk) 12:26, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 12:26, 31 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Barras talk 13:17, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ranjha (clan)

Ranjha (clan) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Harbhajan Piyale has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced, not enough coverage. Harbhajan Piyale (talk) 11:49, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 11:49, 31 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Barras talk 13:16, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Milad Khodaei (footballer)

Milad Khodaei (footballer) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not shown through reliable sources. Playing in the Persian Gulf Pro League isn’t very notable. CountryANDWestern (talk) 11:03, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 11:03, 31 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Barras talk 13:16, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Banaut

Banaut (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Harbhajan Piyale has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Copy- pasted from en:wiki. Harbhajan Piyale (talk) 11:02, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 11:02, 31 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Barras talk 13:15, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kenneth Hurley

Kenneth Hurley (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Refbomb situation — many sources provided, but the bulk are his name mentioned in credits of video games or articles about those games or technologies where he is quoted once. Many sources are wikis or blogs and are therefore not reliable. CountryANDWestern (talk) 10:24, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Keep: Kenneth has made notable contributions to the technology and gaming industries over several decades. His roles at major companies like Electronic Arts, Intel, and Nvidia. Demonstrate his significant impact on software engineering and artificial intelligence, supporting his notability. User:Laosminto 06:27, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Which reliable sources prove that? CountryANDWestern (talk) 08:38, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: We need more citations. Darrenchant (talk) 08:37, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 10:24, 31 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Barras talk 13:14, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Above the clouds (song)

Above the clouds (song) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails w:en:WP:NSONG --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:27, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete per nominator; fails NSONG and WP:GNG so a clear delete. --IWI (talk) 02:44, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 22:27, 30 July 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Related pages

All archives before July 2008 - implementation of new system made archives redundant
Category:Requests for deletion that did not succeed
Category:Requests for deletion that succeeded
Wikipedia:Deletion policy
Wikipedia:Quick deletion
Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Category:Deletion requests
Category:Quick deletion requests