Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 May 5

May 5

File:GMA Pinoy TV logo.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2025 May 12. ✗plicit 14:24, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:GMA Pinoy TV logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Steve's Lava Chicken.mp3

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SAMPLE states that a sample of a song must be scaled to about 10% of the song length. This song, which is only 34 seconds long, would only justify a 3 second clip. 18 seconds is far, far more than 3 seconds. And 3 seconds is effectively worthless in improving a readers understand of the subject per WP:NFCC#8. Also, this audio file is effectively the entire song. It may be a 18 second sample only of a 34 second song, but that remaining 16 seconds is mainly just instrumentals and the intro. This is basically the entire verse. Also, there's not enough critical commentary towards the songs composition itself to warrant this sample. λ NegativeMP1 00:12, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just delete it. I'm not sure how you even saw this file like 10 seconds after I uploaded it, but whatever. TzarN64 (talk) 00:13, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Because I created the article that this audio sample and the image you uploaded are featured in. They are on my watch list. Also, both of these files are ones similar to ones I thought of uploading for the article myself — before I realized they would not pass NFCC. So my rationale here was basically ready to go. λ NegativeMP1 00:22, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Steves Lava Chicken.jpeg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A screenshot of the film scene where this song happens does not significantly improve a readers understanding of the song itself. There is also no critical commentary towards the scene itself - just the song. This image purely exists for decorative use and does not have enough contextual significance to justify placement in the article. Also fails WP:NFCC#8. λ NegativeMP1 00:14, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fine Gael logo 2009.svg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. ✗plicit 00:04, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:F#Multiple_restrictions as there's no proof that this vector non-free logo is officially sourced. Wcam (talk) 17:40, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I see no evidence that this isn't the right logo. A cursory glance around google searches seems to indicate the logo is correct. Buffs (talk) 15:39, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Kept but relicense as {{PD-Ineligible-USOnly}} While i agree that the logo is correct and even INUSE, this file isn't really enough for fair-use rationale in the United States (Threshold of originality rule is unknown in Ireland), and apparently the current license is wrong. So i suggest the file to be relicensed as PD-US and restore large size of the file. 103.111.102.118 (talk) 01:42, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Godflesh Merciless.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: convert to free license. ✗plicit 00:08, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is artwork for a British album, made by adding text to an image from the film Meshes of the Afternoon (0:33 in this version). Since the original film isn't under copyright in the United States, I think we can mark this as {{PD-USonly}} and replace with a full-resolution image. hinnk (talk) 20:37, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.