Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 May 30
May 30
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Absolutiva (talk) 03:39, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- File:Kimberly Potter jail booking photo December 23 2021.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Minnemeeples (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFC#UUI, if a person who is alive. Absolutiva (talk) 03:24, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- File:Love is in the Air 1992 by JPY.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tobyjamesaus (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
A month back, uploader mistook caption notice as a PROD tag and attempted removal of the caption (diff) just because the cover art is the notable / official artwork from the 1992 re-release
. The file was then de-PRODded by another editor just because it's still "used". I appreciate identifying the specific (re-)release, but I'm unconvinced that this cover art is necessary and contextually significant to the song in question.
Indeed, the song is a mid-1970s disco hit by an Aussie singer. Well, the 1992 remix of the old classic was also a hit in several nations, like major ones in Oceania. Nonetheless, besides (merely?) identifying the release, I can't help wonder why deleting this cover art would impact the understanding of the original version... and the remix itself. Just by reading the whole article, readers would already understand the hit disco song and its remix version used in a film, right? George Ho (talk) 06:09, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Keep The remix over 2 decades later made the top ten in 3 major western countries. It's notable enough on its own to have an article by itself which would make an image like this appropriate. Putting them together makes sense too. Buffs (talk) 16:46, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- File:Keiarna Stewart.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tereraheel (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Flickr-washing. Single use/upload account. Flickr upload & Wikipedia upload time was uploaded within an hour. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 18:13, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Query And...what is your rationale for deletion/tagging to another license? I see no evidence of copyvio. I see no other similar images online (see tineye). Buffs (talk) 22:21, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - the flickr source looks to be used fopr license washing. This is a publicity photo also used as a profile image on their twitter account. Note the low-res. The claim for a free license is not credible. -- Whpq (talk) 01:18, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not seeing that. I'm also not saying it isn't Flickr washing. I'm just saying I'm not seeing direct evidence of it via this statement. Buffs (talk) 18:03, 31 May 2025 (UTC)