Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 June 2

June 2

File:TroyeSivanBloomAltCover.jpg

Delete. Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8. Not notable alternative artwork used only in a Japanese edition of the album. CatchMe (talk · contribs) 03:10, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Buffs (talk) 14:57, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Alternatively, delete the other one Buffs (talk) 14:57, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:London and Continental Railways (logo).png

Replaced by file uploaded to Commons. Cloudbound (talk) 11:48, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete noncontroversial. Buffs (talk) 14:58, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Audiogram logo.png

Unused logo, superceded by vector version. Cloudbound (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete noncontroversial. Buffs (talk) 14:58, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Linkin Park - From Zero (deluxe).png

Fails to meet WP:NFCC 3a and 8. A deluxe edition artwork that does not "significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic". CatchMe (talk · contribs) 13:50, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Buffs (talk) 15:00, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Providing the context of the article in question, From Zero has been promoted in different ways, including a deluxe edition to which two singles were specificially used to promote it, instead of just the album in question. This addition helps to provide WP:CONTEXT of what else is being promoted. Where else would it go? A seperate article? How else do you explain the context of two singles being used to promote the deluxe edition of the album? Also, I've recently edited The Tortured Poets Department which has been nominated as a good article. That helps give readers an understanding that there are two versions of that album. What's so different about this? Rockmusicfanatic20 (talk) 15:29, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A nomination as a GA of a different article isn't evidence that this choice is good. Each article/image should be discussed within its own justification. WP:NFC outlines the requirements for use of copyrighted materials. Within articles about albums and singles, they normally contain the cover art of that work for purposes of identification which is usually copyrighted. If more than one such image is desired (differing designs in different countries, a deluxe cover that is substantively different, etc), then the article must generally contain at least one substantial sentence about each of the displayed album covers. This content must reflect significant, third-party commentary about each cover's appearance. "Substantial" usually means something like at least 20 words per album cover and that the content is more than a simple description of the album's appearance (e.g., "In 2010, the lead singer said the all-blue color scheme is meant to evoke feelings of 'both literal and figurative coolness' and clearly evokes that with it's soaring chorus...", not "The cover shows a blue guitar on a blue background"). More than one cover that is not substantially different is generally prohibited. Buffs (talk) 16:18, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toyota Sienna (XL30) IMG 3635.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:06, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image has the license plate visible in the foreground, and license plates are linked to personal information. We have other images of the third generation Sienna that have the plate blurred out. Cyber the tiger🐯 (talk) 15:58, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.