Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 June 12

June 12

File:SeaTac Airport Station Pictogram.svg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:28, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

White logo against transparent background which does not show. Wcam (talk) 13:50, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The logo for a train station/line isn't necessary. Fails WP:NFCC. Buffs (talk) 15:22, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep due to its significance as both an icon and part of the public art collection (as described in the article). It was originally displayed in the infobox, hence the white color, but should now be updated to properly display in the body. Sounder Bruce 20:51, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete from local use Well, isn't really necessary to place Logos of train station. Additionally, they didn't register SeaTac Pictogram logo to US Copyright Office, therefore fair use claim is questionnable. If someone wants to update the color of the logo, it should be done at Commons instead. 103.111.102.118 (talk) 07:17, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any evidence of the free license claimed above? A similar icon was previously deleted as a result of c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sound Transit icons.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:09, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not necessary to understand subject. If it is actually not copyright it can be uploaded to Commons, although I am under the impression copyright status is automatic under current US law and does not require registration. Traumnovelle (talk) 10:42, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - A new version has been uploaded with a proper background for display outside of the infobox, Wcam. Sounder Bruce 01:19, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I maintain that this image should be deleted as it fails to meet the non-free content criteria. a) The logo is historical and is no longer used by the subject of the article, SeaTac/Airport station. As such, it does not serve the primary function of a non-free logo, which is to identify the current organization or entity. b) The image's contextual significance is minimal, as it is only mentioned in two sentences within the article. Its omission would not be detrimental to a reader's understanding of the article as a whole, which means it fails WP:NFCC#8. The information can be adequately conveyed by textual description or an external link. --Wcam (talk) 21:23, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GOP Logo1.svg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Transfer to Commons. Sennecaster (Chat) 06:09, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not exactly sure if this is above the threshold of originality, so I’m putting it here. Wikipedian^{Talk to me!}_{or not…} 08:36, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Convert to free license, the elephant is {{PD-US-1978-89}} (see c:Category:Republican Party elephant mascot) and the text is {{PD-textlogo}}. ✗plicit 23:45, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Transfer to Commons I suspected that the elephant may be fall under {{PD-US-no notice}} instead of {{PD-US-1978-89}} (presumably this logo was made in 1960s at earliest), aside from just "GOP" text (which is surely {{PD-textlogo}}. Feel free to transfer the file to Commons 103.111.102.118 (talk) 12:27, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2025 Ballymena riot.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:28, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No rationale given for NFCC#1 nor NFCC#2. The incident is still on-going and thus free media could be created. Traumnovelle (talk) 10:32, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:09, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:George-Perry.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:George-Perry.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:39, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nicole Ferentz.JPG

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nicole Ferentz.JPG Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:51, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UllaAkselsonPic.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was uploaded to illustrate the article about Swedish actresse Ulla Akselson, but the source made a big mistake: it depicts Inger Taube, from Bo Widerberg's 1963 film Barnvagnen, where she played alongside Ulla Akselson. See Imdb photos for that movie (including this one depicting Ulla Akselson). Since the name of the file is incorrect and since there's no article about Inger Taube, we don't need that photograph. TwøWiñgš Talk to me 20:46, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.