Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 February 27
February 27
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
- File:PRCConstitutionCoverLowRes.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Blue844098 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
I don't believe this is a non-free file. Given that this is a document published by the government, this cover art of PRC Constitution should be relicensed under either (PD-China) or (PD-China-exempt) instead. 103.111.102.118 (talk) 03:13, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- This might also be PD-US because it's an edict of government. That could just apply to the text though. JayCubby 22:23, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- US law would not apply. Buffs (talk) 04:13, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
- Keep/move to Commons has more details and feel free to use Google translate because I did... It appears that government works are PD in China if they are for official use. Given that this cover is for their Constitution, it seems a fitting tag. Might be worth creating a template. Buffs (talk) 04:20, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. Trimming can be requested with {{Non-free reduce}}. ✗plicit 14:05, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
- File:The Ren & Stimpy Show - Happy Happy Joy Joy scene.webm (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by RTSthestardust (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Does not satisfy point 8 WP:NFCC in all articles used. — Ирука13 12:19, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- Disagree. For both, the file is accompanied with sufficient commentary. JayCubby 22:23, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- Or, if it's up to you, it could be kept in about 15 seconds (it just being the beginning chorus for "Happy Happy, Joy Joy", prominently featuring Ren and Stimpy's dance), or if it were to be kept overall, remain in its initial length. RTSthestardust (talk) 03:45, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep This clip is indeed discussed in-depth in both articles. I don't see how this fails NFCC#8. It can/should be trimmed to an appropriate length as soon as this discussion is over. Buffs (talk) 04:25, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. Replaced it with the grody lookin' crop. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:52, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- File:Armadillo heels by Alexander McQueen.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Premeditated Chaos (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Free alternatives exist, granted, not of the same quality, but those free alternatives come from Flickr. This is not at all irreplaceable. JayCubby 22:14, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- Could you link some of your suggested alternatives? I was not able to find any when I was writing the article, although it's been several years and things do change. When I initially looked, many of the results appeared to be Flickr-washing, knockoffs, or the ornaments sold by the Met rather than the actual shoes. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:38, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- PMC, are they not depicted in File:Platos Atlantis at Savage Beauty.jpg? JayCubby 01:02, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Ah, yeah, I guess even if it looks like ass. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:51, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- PMC, are they not depicted in File:Platos Atlantis at Savage Beauty.jpg? JayCubby 01:02, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.