Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 February 21

February 21

File:Canaan with President Lahoud.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence that this image was taken by a government employee. No link given to a government source, and the disclaimer "The name (and official business) of the U.S. department employee who took this photograph in Lebanon is classified" is insufficient. In ticket:2025022110008465, someone claiming to be the uploader has said that they fraudulently claimed it was taken by a U.S. government employee when uploading, but even without their ticket there is no evidence that this licensing is appropriate. Note that a previous "no permission" speedy deletion was declined by Explicit. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:23, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, insufficient licensing information. Tenpop421 (talk) 16:50, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, absolutely no proof of permission nor the creator of the image. The fact that it's attributed to an unnamed U.S. official whose identity is "classified" is absolutely absurd. That's just not how it works. If this image was part of a covert operation then how can it exist or be used? Ridiculous. Mesoutopia (talk) 16:59, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Universal Kids Resort Theme Art.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fails. WP:NFCC8, not primary topic --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 23:21, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. — Ирука¹³ 18:35, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.