Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 April 5
Appearance
April 5
[edit]- File:Hibatullah Akhundzada.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by TEMPO156 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Per WP:NFC#UUI, Pictures of people still alive, groups still active, and buildings still standing; provided that taking a new free picture as a replacement (which is almost always considered possible) would serve the same encyclopedic purpose as the non-free image.
Absolutiva (talk) 05:03, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- It is impossible to take a new image in this case as the guidelines say. This is the only image of him allowed to exist and they specifically disallow anyone outside the Taliban from accessing him. TEMPO156 (talk) 08:48, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- I understand if you’re not familiar with the topic that it looks like it could be replaceable, but it isn’t. He operates in unparalleled secrecy, and this is probably the number one case where it makes sense to use a non-free image of a living person. Nobody even knows what he looks like apart from this one photo, and many doubt whether he’s even alive since he’s so unseen. Deleting it would harm readers’ understanding and would be a real shame because we definitely will never be getting a replacement. TEMPO156 (talk) 06:14, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per Tempo. ―Howard • 🌽33 09:45, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- File:Portrait of Mabel Allington Royds by Ernest Lumsden.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
File marked as URAA-restored, but this painting was published in 1911, what makes it PD in US as well. Michalg95 (talk) 10:37, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- File:Punggol Sapphire Signboard.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jasper Ng (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unused, no obvious use, can't be moved to commons due to FOP issues. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 11:36, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- File:Kirk and Newsom ("And, This is Charlie Kirk").png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Editorthatedits (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This image is not the subject of any significant sourced critical commentary. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 12:08, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- If you would like I could add some commentary around the image to make it pass the standard. I see your point. Editorthatedits (talk) 21:45, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- You will also need to demonstrate why the article needs this image and why uts removal would be detrimental to a readers understanding of the topic. -- Whpq (talk) 21:54, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- Would you like me to add more details about it on the information about it being fair use? Editorthatedits (talk) 21:59, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- You will also need to demonstrate why the article needs this image and why uts removal would be detrimental to a readers understanding of the topic. -- Whpq (talk) 21:54, 5 April 2025 (UTC)