Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 July 23
July 23
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- File:Sisterhood of Karn in the Night of the Doctor.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gothaparduskerialldrapolatkh (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Exists solely for illustrative purposes, and does not benefit a specific aspect of the article in a significant manner. While I do feel an image could be used in this article, this image feels largely unneeded and does not greatly benefit readers. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 03:27, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No consensus -Fastily 02:16, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- File:Wishtreesign.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Slowking4 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
I relicensed this as {{Cc-by-3.0}} but Graeme Bartlett reverted my relicensing to the original licensing, {{Photo_of_art|{{Cc-by-3.0|FU FUN|dw=yes}}||{{Non-free 2D art|image has rationale=yes}}}} because they thought that there is enough on the sign to be copyrightable. I don't see what on this sign would be above c:COM:TOO US, it's just normal, unstylized text and nothing else. Jonteemil (talk) 22:07, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- It is the quantity of text that is the problem. There are two small paragraphs of text. Enough so that no one would have written that particular text before. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:31, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, so you are saying that the message itself is what's copyrightable, not the particular reproduction of the message? Would that really be applicable on this work that is just an info sign and not a work of art? That seems far-fetched however I'm no lawyer. Jonteemil (talk) 22:49, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:40, 23 July 2024 (UTC)- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.