Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 October 14

October 14

File:Jackson FOTR mithril shirt.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This file does not appear to comply with the non-free content criteria, specifically:
Criterion 1 (1), because the file is replaceable by text:
This screenshot shows "a fairly ordinary chain mail shirt, light, with a simple ornament in the neckline area".

Criterion 1 (2), or by a free file that exists or could be created, which would serve the same encyclopedic purposes:
Can be recreated.
Most likely can be photographed, like the rest of the film's inventory. And its design is not original enough to be copyrighted.
+
Criterion 8, because the file does not significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding. — Ирука¹³ 09:35, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Armoiries troisieme republique francaise.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image with no traceable source. Tineye results suggest that (a version of) this image also used to be hosted at Commons as c:File:Francecoatofarms1898-2.png until it was deleted from there in 2018 since no source was provided. Felix QW (talk) 19:23, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:49, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Annadurai and Goubert.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It seems as if this orphaned image was made after 1951, when Goubert entered the political arena. This makes it still copyrighted in India in 1996 (the URAA restoration date) and thus also still copyrighted in the US. Felix QW (talk) 19:28, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:50, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yanam Venkanna Babu Ratham 2.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No indication of free license at the source or archived versions thereof. Unsure of the potential for non-free use in the three articles it is currently being used in. Felix QW (talk) 19:41, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While there is currently much confusion at Commons about the applicability of the Government Open Data License to photographs, the source website is defunct since 2010 and Tineye does not find the photo on any government webpages since. Therefore it is unlikely to ever have been distributed under the GODL, which was only introduced in 2017. Felix QW (talk) 20:56, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Telugu Script Chart a.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned files with no indication of a free license at the source. Felix QW (talk) 19:43, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:51, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.