Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 March 11

< March 10	March 12 >

March 11

File:Brian urlacher(3).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 12:50, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Small, low-res, no metadata. See also uploader's talk page. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:53, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 03:24, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Garcia-jeff.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 12:50, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Small, low-res, no metadata. See also uploader's talk page. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:53, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 03:24, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Catchball.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Small, low-res, thumbnail-sized, no metadata. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:57, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Easyworldband.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense as non-free promotional image Whpq (talk) 01:43, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Small, low-res, thumbnail-sized, no metadata. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:07, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to non-free promotional and add a fair use. Band dissolved in 2004 so a free alternative seems unlikely. Also, seems to have been taked from Fierce Panda Records. Salavat (talk) 03:27, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dynamic Praise.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Small, low-res, thumbnail-sized, no metadata. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:14, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Frontaeroport.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Small, low-res, no metadata. See also Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2011_June_19#File:Picture6-1-.jpg --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:50, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 03:28, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ian-dempsey.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtful own work per uploader's talk page. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:05, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mike Castle Pic.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook metadata in EXIF. Permission needed. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:31, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 03:28, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Windows XP Logo and Wordmark.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Retain non-free license. Whpq (talk) 01:58, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Should be moved to Commons; not creative enough. The Microsoft-style logo image is probably below TOO; it's just a window with a fancy gradient. Also, even if this was above TOO, this would be replaceable with commons:File:Windows XP wordmark.svg. --Matr1x-101 $_{when-replying}^{Ping-me}$ {_{user page @ commons} - ^talk - _contribs} 21:44, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose/Status quo Commons has determined via multiple DRs (e.g. 1, 2) that the Windows XP logo is above TOO. If you disagree, then you'll first need to open an undeletion request at Commons. -FASTILY 01:45, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.