Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 May 16

< May 15	May 17 >

May 16

File:Syndicate.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is used on Syndicate (series). For Syndicate (1993 video game) a different screenshot is used, File:Syndicate screenshot.png. I don't think the series needs a screenshot in this case? Or if it does, it could use the same screenshot? — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 10:15, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as duplicate image. I also added a higher quality version of the other image because the bot seems to have ruined its image quality completely when resizing it. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:33, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, we don't need screenshot for the infobox of series article. Replace it with the series' logo. Neocorelight (Talk) 23:48, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Regus Suburban Economic Survey.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source image could be traced to a stock photo website that does not indicate a free license. [1] Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:44, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, obvious copyvio is obvious. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 23:01, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:57, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Spaces Herengracht Amsterdam.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.idealista.com/news/inmobiliario/oficinas/2019/04/11/772646-iwg-potencia-a-spaces-en-madrid-con-su-sexto-coworking-en-la-capital credits "Regus" and is an article from 2019 while this file was uploaded in 2020. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 23:18, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:58, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Splat Mural.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is no freedom of panorama in Singapore for 2D graphic works. According to [2], this artwork, Faces of Singapore, was done by artists Cheryl, Beryl and Ching. Needs commercial license from them. Current status does not qualify for any of the criteria at WP:Non-free content criteria. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:44, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:58, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HP Presents MissionSpace Sign.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The sign is a 2D artistic work. EPCOT Park is situated in the United States, where freedom of panorama only applies to architectural works, not artistic works. Needs commercial license permission from the sign designer. Current status does not meet WP:NFCC. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:49, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:59, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.