Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 June 1

< May 31	June 2 >

June 1

File:SerenaWilliamsSignature.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm worried that this signature as part of a display photo is not public domain. If it was I could take this signature and put it on a shirt and start selling it, and I don't think I can do that. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:19, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, signatures by Americans are covered under {{PD-signature}} (I have also updated the licensing of this file from pd-simple). Salavat (talk) 15:00, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep what nom is referring to is something akin to trademark. Wikipedia is only concerned with copyright, which the signature isn’t covered by. Dronebogus (talk) 23:18, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just making sure. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 00:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bubsy 3D Bubsy Visits the James Turrell Retrospective Title Screen.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:01, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suggesting deletion as it is no longer used in the article. Merko (talk) 16:26, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete orphaned unfree file that wasn’t particularly useful anyway. Dronebogus (talk) 23:20, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BrookeValentineGirlfightRemix.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:02, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The cover artwork for the remix of "Girlfight" is visually identical to the original cover artwork save for two small blocks of text. As a result, this artwork adds no additional context to the article, failing WP:NFCC#8 and quite possibly WP:NFCC#3a. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 20:16, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete redundant, near-identical at the low resolution it’s presented at. Dronebogus (talk) 00:54, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no need to fair use two images that are 98% identical. WikiVirusC^(talk) 02:23, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Linda Lovelace photo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Free image has been found (cropped from PD group photo), no longer needed. Dronebogus (talk) 23:17, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Holotecture3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also needs permission from the book's author. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:47, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unused and probably useless potentially non-free file. Dronebogus (talk) 00:53, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:55, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.