Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 June 13

< June 12	June 14 >

June 13

File:Site plan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:10, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is own work, why would you upload it with a resolution in which the text is unreadable? — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 07:21, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:57, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Provides nothing, you can't make out much from the image and has limited value while the licence is questionable at best. Terasail ^[✉️] 12:18, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RFC Second Lieutenant Karl Brooks Heisey 1920.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:01, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFGALLERY B (talk) 10:00, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hi NFGallery this is photo taken in 1920 over 100 years ago in Canada this is a work to which no copyright applies as it was created before 1949. I understand I have to show compliance with US copyright laws which are different ( even though the photo is of a Canadian and taken in Canada with no connection to the USA) and imposed on the rest of the world by Wikipedia. The photo is used in a Wikipedia article on the subject Kark Brooks Heisey. This is the only picture of Heisey in uniform in existence that I am aware of and it is used in the Karl Brooks Heisey article which I believe constitutes fair use whatever that means. I dont understand the issue being raised here. Unionville (talk) 12:16, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What more do you want?

Media data and Non-free use rationale

Description

Photo of Karl Brooks Heisey World War 1 Royal Air Force Second Lieutenant taken 1920

Author or

copyright owner

Not Known

Source (WP:NFCC#4)

Family photo inherited by descendant of Karl Brooks Heisey who posted photo on wikimedia

Publication

December 12, 2016 wikipedia

Date of publication

1919-1920

Use in article (WP:NFCC#7)

Karl Brooks Heisey

Purpose of use in article (WP:NFCC#8)

illustrate subject of article in military uniform as part of article which concerns World War 1 service

Not replaceable with

free media because (WP:NFCC#1)

not replaceable only known image of subject in military uniform contemporary to end of WW1 in existence

Minimal use (WP:NFCC#3)

yes head shot only portrait photo image cannot be reduced further and provide image of subject

Respect for

commercial opportunities (WP:NFCC#2)

no commercial use or impac Unionville (talk) 12:24, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, photograph would be in the public domain in both Canada and the United States per {{PD-Canada}}. The Non-free use rationale can be removed and the photo moved to Commons. Salavat (talk) 15:02, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I dont know how to do that. Unionville (talk) 18:53, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and restore 2016 revision as it's PD per {{PD-Canada}}. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 19:12, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ArchiCAD9Screenshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused screenshot of non-free software. Could qualify for fair use if used on ArchiCAD. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:54, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ixfd64, I added File:Archicad screenshot (floor plan).jpg to Archicad. If you think File:ArchiCAD9Screenshot.jpg is better I don't feel too strongly either way. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 20:31, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think either one is fine. Ixfd64 (talk) 05:49, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.