Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 February 23
February 23
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- File:Ben-Ku-MARTA.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by gujamin (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphan,Copyright violation,Possibly unfree,Wrong license or status gujamin (talk) 04:49, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- File:Jerry's Painting.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by NetflixSoup (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Previously FFD-nominated eleven years ago. Result was kept due to article being reworked and expanded (or something like that) in order to justify usage of the screenshot (of the painting), which has been the episode's one of focal points. I can't say whether the screenshot significant helps readers identify a main part of the episode. However, the issue is whether omitting the screenshot can affect the understanding of what the article can convey in text about its subject. Reading the article without using the screenshot, I think I know what a "topless" goddess, "nudity", and a "cherub" in a painting mean. As I figured, so will any other reader. Furthermore, at the end of the episode, the painting was somewhat altered to cover up the nudity, consequently changing the painting's meaning. The plot is resolved as almost every other episode has been. Moreover, the main plot may be about the painting, but it's either also or more about reactions toward it and resolving the dilemma. Like some other episodes have been, it's also about making fun of conservatism. In short, I don't think omitting a screenshot of any painting would make any difference (to most or all readers), would it? George Ho (talk) 10:07, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- File:Former Command House.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Flipchip73 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
I don't believe this image meets the non-free use rationale, which requires that non-free content "used for a purpose that cannot be fulfilled by free material (text or images, existing or to be created)" (emphasis mine): this is an extant building, someone could take a photograph of it and upload it to Commons. Girth Summit (blether) 10:49, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: convert to fair use. ✗plicit 03:59, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- File:Parti Berjaya Logo.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Molecule Extraction (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This appears to be a complex logo and {{PD-ineligible}} should not apply. Wcam (talk) 15:26, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Relicense to non-free logo and add a fair use. Salavat (talk) 14:40, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- The graphic element in the center is an outline map of the Malaysian state of Sabah. At least in the United States, such maps are not eligible for copyright protection. However, Malaysia likely has a low threshold of originality as it is a former British colony and a common law country. I suggest relicensing to
{{PD-ineligible-USonly|Malaysia}}based on the discussions linked from c:COM:TOO Malaysia. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:26, 24 February 2022 (UTC) - Relicense to non-free logo. The so-called "map" looks like a pig's head to me, and it's neither simple nor anything like a map of Arkansas (seen in c:COM:TOO US). Furthermore, the expressed map may have some originality (citing one old Commons discussion), like this one. Also, the map of one region is used as part of the flag, not as a stand-alone map. George Ho (talk) 08:33, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- File:HaleSpringsInn.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Diezba (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Image is from the town's chamber of commerce according to the description. VRT permission is needed. Parent article already has an image of much better quality. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:02, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.