Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 August 29
August 29
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
- File:Powell S. Barnett.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SD0001 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The link to the archived source website does not provide attribution/substantiation that this photo is in the public domain. Furthermore, if you go to that page now, it shows "Fair use image" as the description. Logan Talk Contributions 02:42, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment At the time it was uploaded, the page used to say it's in public domain. See https://web.archive.org/web/20150518124655/http://www.blackpast.org/aaw/barnett-powell-s-1883-1971 which says "Image Ownership: Public Domain". But now they've changed it to say "Fair use image" :( – SD0001 (talk) 10:03, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - We do not have clear provenance for this file. The archived link does indeed state that the image is PD, but has been since changed. SD0001 uploaded this in good faith reliant on an explicit declaration of Public Domain, but the source site seems to have gotten it wrong and corrected it since. The archived site provides a source that they used for their article, "Historylink.org Online Encyclopedia of Washington State History, “Powell S. Barnett (1883-1971)” (by Mary T. Henry)" This archive is the oldest archive I could find which is from Oct 18, 2016 which is a bit after the archive of the source site used for this picture. That archive does not show this image used in the article. Oddly, the current site does have the image attributing it as CC0 to SD0001 which doesn't really help figure out the original source. Without this information, its impossible to determine the licensing. Conversion to non-free use is not supportable for a couple of reasons. WP:NFCC#4 for previous publication with permission from the copyright holder is unclear. WP:NFCC#1 as [1] includes a photo from 1900 which should qualify under c:Template:PD-US-unpublished as PD. -- Whpq (talk) 19:28, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:18, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
- File:LIV 9-0 BOU Programme.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Idiosincrático (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
A copyright programme is not needed to understand a football match. Other images, of the ground or players for example, are available. Stephen 11:28, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:20, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
- File:CBA USA states.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by MJHankel (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
DW, no permission. Logo licensed as fair use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:16, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 08:00, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- File:Princeofpersialogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dude527 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Could probably be replaced with the VRT-confirmed File:Prince of Persia 1 - Macintosh - Starting screen.png as there does not seem to be any commentary about this specific logo. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:06, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.