Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 July 23

< July 22	July 24 >

July 23

File:Abstinence pledge card.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work of copyrighted designs. The parent page already has several other free alternatives. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:12, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Anders Gronstedt ASTD TechLearning.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious own-work claim. The quality of this image suggests that this is a screenshot from an unattributed video. ✗plicit 12:52, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Photo of low quality, lacks EXIF data, and it definitely doesn't help that TechLearning apparently specializes in recorded webinars (further reinforcing the possibility of unattributed video). Subject is still alive so presumably someone else could take a photo. --Elephanthunter (talk) 21:07, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Astolat Dollhouse Castle - West Balcony.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation? Can be found on http://www.astolatdollhousecastle.com/gallery/ (direct link). The local version is larger, but the windows appear to have been strangely edited. ✗plicit 13:20, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Light digging shows uploader has other photos on Astolat Dollhouse Castle very obviously not taken by the uploader (despite uploader's claim), also with strange Photoshop modifications? Not sure what is going with the photo edits. But the fact that uploader was not honest about the other image sort of casts doubt on whether this specific image is his own. Sad because the dollhouse is apparently no longer on display. --Elephanthunter (talk) 20:59, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: A lot of the original photos are on Commons at c:Category:Astolat Dollhouse Castle. The uploader DavidHalpernist says the pictures were "taken by me with the permission of the concerned authorities." Assuming this is true, delete on the grounds that the local pictures were modified from their original source in such a way that makes them less useful. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:40, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:North tower - Towards wizard's lair.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Originally taken by Zack DeZon/Bloomberg for use in an article [1]. See original image [2]. Uploader's image also appears to have strange photoshop modifications. Elephanthunter (talk) 20:47, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lourdes@50.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Complex logo, source page does not indicate a free license. Not sure if a limited-time anniversary logo would quality for fair use. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:57, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.