Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 August 28

< August 27	August 29 >

August 28

File:Starro, The Suicide Squad, Aug 2021.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 September 4. ✗plicit 04:41, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Starro, The Suicide Squad, Aug 2021.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Identification of the Netflix series comic book.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:08, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free comic book cover claimed to be used for identification but is in a section of the article. The cover is not the subject of significant sourced commentary. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 01:04, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Taskmaster, Black Widow, July 2021.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:08, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image claiming to be used for identification but appears at the bottom of the article without any significant sourced commentary about the image. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 01:06, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Peacemaker, The Suicide Squad, July 2021.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:08, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image stated to be used for visual identification but the image is in the other media section of the article with no significant sourced commentary about the image. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 01:11, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MELiSSA Loop.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#3; this image is very replicable with a free alternative. — Pbrks (talk) 03:15, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bent But Not Broken 4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Resolved, converted to non-free -FASTILY 04:02, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

book cover for Bent But Not Broken, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 03:50, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, looks to be mis-licensed so I have relicensed as a non-free book cover, added a fair use, and switched it for the Commons version on the article. The Commons file should be then deleted as a copyright violation. Salavat (talk) 08:50, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as non-free. It may or may not be own work as the uploader appears to be a SPA, but VRT permission would be required for the free license. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 18:27, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mega Man X logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a text logo, and is seemingly considered below TOO on the Commons equivalent file. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:27, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like PD-textlogo to me. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 18:23, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kingschildren etc.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kingschildren etc.png. Unfree in the US until 2037 and Finland until 2039. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 14:00, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hermann Geogr Bavar1.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hermann Geogr Bavar1.png Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:41, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ATMscreen.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:ATMscreen.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:47, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clindberg, I'd lean towards this not being enough for copyright protection. It's from Washington Mutual so US TOO applies. The text is all pretty standard stuff like "Make a Transfer" and "Check my Balance" like you'd expect to find on any brand ATM or any electronic banking environment. The UI doesn't have much detail that stands out to me either. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 18:07, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RomanGerizimcoin.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:RomanGerizimcoin.jpeg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:50, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Neville smith 1941.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Crop of Neville Smith (rugby league) of the second photo from http://www.jubileeavenue.com.au/history/history_team1941.php. It was also colorized, but the colorization wasn't done particularly well unless Smith actually looked a bit like a vampire. I have no problem with colorization if done well and ideally with sources for the colors provided. This image has no color sources and wasn't done so well. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 17:45, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Peter Skellern photographed by Michael Putland.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image is used on You're a Lady (album). There already is a non-free image on Peter Skellern for identification. The claimed purpose of use in the article (the album article) is "To show Peter Skellern performing at the height of his fame." No prejudice to swapping out File:Peterskellern.jpg for this photo on Peter Skellern, though as this photo of him performing is black and white that's perhaps not ideal either. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 18:35, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Per Olof Bernhard Wahlberg 01d.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Missing a verifiable source. No prejudice to restoration if someone can provide a citation/non-wikia source for the image -FASTILY 23:27, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unverifiable source. According to wikia:familypedia:Special:Export, wikia:familypedia:File:Per Olof Bernhard Wahlberg 01d.jpg has incomplete information:

<page>
<title>File:Per Olof Bernhard Wahlberg 01d.jpg</title>
<ns>6</ns>
<id>11884</id>
<revision>
<id>27241</id>
<timestamp>2007-03-23T23:13:21Z</timestamp>
<contributor>
<username>Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )</username>
<id>59113</id>
</contributor>
<comment>
Per Olof Bernhard Wahlberg (1852-1927). Source: David Kettlewell, Sweden
</comment>
<model>wikitext</model>
<format>text/x-wiki</format>
<text xml:space="preserve" bytes="72">
Per Olof Bernhard Wahlberg (1852-1927). Source: David Kettlewell, Sweden
</text>
<sha1>k4khixskq5qei8l8qcbp4nlw9jucaj3</sha1>
</revision>
</page>

The information on Wikia is insufficient to determine the source country of the photo.

wikia:familypedia:File:Per_Olof_Bernhard_Wahlberg_01d.jpg automatically redirects to wikia:familypedia:Per Olof Bernhard Wahlberg (1852-1927) and Special:Export was the only method I could find for reading the text of the file information page on Wikia. Stefan2 (talk) 18:41, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help? Could you explain what you are proposing here? The file appears to be PD due to age in the US. Are you worried it may not be a picture of the person claimed? Something else? Sorry, not a master of FfD, I suspect a regular would understand your point. Hobit (talk) 19:08, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I overlooked the fact that the subject died in 1927, so if it's a photo of him, it's presumably in the public domain. It looks like a scan of a published photo of him. I'm unsure what to do about verifiability of photos. If someone writes that This is a photo of Per Olof Bernhard Wahlberg and someone else adds a ^{[citation needed]} tag, how do we handle this situation? --Stefan2 (talk) 21:48, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Timrå IK Logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Historical logo for Timrå IK. Likely does not meet WP:NFCC#8. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 18:42, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wivstavarvs IK Logo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Historical logo for Timrå IK. Likely does not meet WP:NFCC#8. According to the article this logo is from 1928 so PD-USonly in 2024.Category:Future copyright expiration — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 18:46, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Timrå IK 1995 Logo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Historical logo for Timrå IK. Likely does not meet WP:NFCC#8. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 18:54, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Weekend Sunrise Logo07.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Historical logo for Weekend Sunrise. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 19:01, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dieter Rams Design Principles.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be a photo of a sign, likely copyrighted. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:03, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:40, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dinker Rai With President of India.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader says they took a picture from the subject's album. Evidence of permission from the original photographer is required. Also not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:05, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:40, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bosschaert-gezelle-folio.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work Kuttappan Chettan (talk) 19:11, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Willie Haggart.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious low quality. Claimed to be "from personal album". No way to verify the uploader was actually besties with the underworld kingpin, no way to verify the depicted person actually is the underworld kingpin in question and not someone's frat buddy. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 19:13, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Very poor quality. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:25, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Willie Haggart Little Miss Likkle.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious low quality. Claimed to be "own work". No way to verify the uploader was actually besties with the underworld kingpin, no way to verify the depicted person actually is the underworld kingpin in question and not someone's frat buddy. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 19:14, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Boussingault page from musee IMGP0164.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work Kuttappan Chettan (talk) 19:26, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Darjeeling tea Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Procedural close, editorial matter which isn't suitable for FfD. Please consider initiating a new discussion on the talk page of the article. -FASTILY 23:30, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is something weird with this logo. The FUR states that This is the logo for Darjeeling tea. The source is listed as Darjeeling tea. However, the article Darjeeling tea begins with Darjeeling tea is a tea made from Camellia sinensis var. sinensis that is grown and processed in the Darjeeling or Kalimpong Districts in West Bengal, India. Since 2004, the term Darjeeling tea has been a registered geographical indication referring to products produced on certain estates within Darjeeling and Kalimpong. In other words, there is no organisation called "Darjeeling tea" which can produce logos. Where does the logo come from? Is the logo relevant to the article? Stefan2 (talk) 20:27, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan2, Darjeeling Tea Association. The logo can be seen on page 16 of [1]. Also on http://www.teaboard.gov.in/. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 23:16, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Hm. So is this logo important enough to satisfy WP:NFCC#8? The file currently fails WP:NFCC#10c as it is not relevant to the use of the logo. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:54, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  Stefan2, I was going to say it doesn't satisfy NFCC#8, but after one more search for the origins of the logo I'm now inclined to say it does, also, I wasn't quite right about the Darjeeling Tea Association: "The Tea Board of India, perplexed by the issue at hand, announced the launch of the Darjeeling Tea logo which would limit the branding of Darjeeling to the produce exclusively to the 87 estates of the Himalayan region. Darjeeling Tea logo and brand came to life in 1983 [...] According to the Tea Board of India, the use of the word Darjeeling Tea and the logo are protected as Geographical Indications (GI) in India and as Certification Trade Marks (CTM) in UK, USA, Australia and Taiwan. A major development in this area is the registration of Darjeeling as a Community Collective Mark (CCM) in the European Union." [2] — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 10:08, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  But does anyone use the logo? I tried looking at Darjeeling tea packages. This, which I saw in a supermarket, has a different symbol (File:European Union protected geographical indication (PGI) logo.png), but the Darjeeling tea logo was not used, neither on the front nor on the back. I checked the website of Twinings [3], but I can't see the logo. The logo could of course be on the back of the package (not seen on the website). I see that Lipton has it on the back of the package.[4] If someone invents a logo for the purpose of protecting a brand, but few manufacturers use the logo, then I don't think that the logo meets WP:NFCC#8. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:53, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  Stefan2, so far I found Yule Tea, Vahdam, Golden Tips, Wagh Bakri (Gujarat Tea Processors & Packers Ltd), The Tea Cottage (bottom left) and Golden Orange Pekoe. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 12:03, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  Those are mostly Indian websites, Indian companies and/or companies clearly marketing the tea as coming from India. Maybe the logo has more importance on the Indian market than in the rest of the world? --Stefan2 (talk) 12:28, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  Stefan2, all English language packaging though, I'd think product for the Indian market would also include text in Hindi. It is possible the logo is valued more in some markets than others. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 13:18, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.