Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 September 25

< September 24	September 26 >

September 25

File:Uqairtradition.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Izno (talk) 01:20, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Uqairtradition.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sahoodqasr.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Izno (talk) 01:22, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sahoodqasr.jpg. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WugTest NowThereIsAnotherOne FairUseOnly.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 October 3. Izno (talk) 01:29, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:WugTest NowThereIsAnotherOne FairUseOnly.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:For the wiki page of "AnotherCastleMusic".png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Izno (talk) 01:22, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Logo uploaded by blocked sockmaster User:AnotherCastleMusic, likely intended for use on their self-promotional draft at User:AnotherCastleMusic/sandbox. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 03:08, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, essentially orphaned (not used in the main space) with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 05:56, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:For the music artist "Twisted Ocean".jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Izno (talk) 01:22, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Album cover uploaded by blocked sockmaster User:AnotherCastleMusic, likely intended for use on their self-promotional drafts. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 03:09, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 05:56, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rabbit running.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G5 by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. No other encyclopedic use. It is not a particular useful photo of a rabbit so I see no reason to transfer to Commons. Whpq (talk) 18:44, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unhelpful, unusable. Wikipedia is not a repository of personal images. Softlavender (talk) 04:29, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 05:56, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted created by a sock of a banned user. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:06, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Cow photos by Holly2017

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete per WP:G5 — Wug·a·po·des 02:02, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low quality images of cows taken from a car. The subjects are bvarely visible. No foreseeable encyclopedic use to justify transferring to Commons. -- Whpq (talk) 18:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. Unusable; unhelpful. Wikipedia is not a repository of images. -- Softlavender (talk) 04:28, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 05:57, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete all, user has been CU blocked as a sockpuppet and the images have no encyclopedic purpose. --bonadea contributions talk 16:07, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete all and tagged as such, user is a sock of Weeedd (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) per NinjaRobotPirate at ANI. Home Lander (talk) 01:45, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wandering Green User IRL.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:04, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image is licensed as CC-0 but is a composite image for which one component is a copyrighted image. The background flames are not the uploader's own work. See here for a copy of the background flames image attributed to Getty. Whpq (talk) 19:02, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---Holy moly, I forgot about the background! Whoops... In that case, what would the image be licensed by now?

~Wandering Green User~✨ 〠 19:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is a copyright violation and should be deleted. You can request its deletion by adding {{db-author}}. -- Whpq (talk) 19:10, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you have tools to make your own flaming backgrounds, you can always make a new image that is 100% your creative content, then upload it to the commons with an appropriate license. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 21:07, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, copyright issues per nom. Salavat (talk) 05:58, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.