Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 October 21

< October 20	October 22 >

October 21

File:Hewitt-Gleeson.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded with a {{PD-self}}, which might be appropriate because it is a derivative work of an image found online. We would also need a license for the original image, but there is no indication that the original image was available with a wikimedia-compliant license. ★ Bigr Tex 01:54, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 15:07, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sandeep Maheshwari Signature.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 18:08, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

signature of a (notable?) person from India, dubious own-work claim. Since Indian law is based on Common law, this may not be eligible for PD-signature FASTILY 05:34, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 15:07, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Missfilmy-logo-retina.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, likely copyrighted (some prior use per reverse image search) Ytoyoda (talk) 14:20, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 15:07, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Drno453.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The front cover of the Al Caiola recording used at James Bond Theme#Cover versions is unneeded and should be deleted unless reliable sources can prove me wrong. The article barely mentions this recording but doesn't emphasize the recording as much as Moby's remix recording. The uploader de-PRODded the file, claiming the necessity of the image:

The image accompanies the "cover version" section of the article, as it was not only the first US cover version of the song but was mentioned in the US pressbook as the original soundtrack was not issued at that time. The image also features an image of Connery from the film.

However, the Caiola recording being the first cover version in the US and image of Connery as Bond don't suffice justification of using the single cover. I couldn't find reliable sources substantially covering the recording. George Ho (talk) 22:21, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.