Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 November 22

< November 21	November 23 >

November 22

File:Led Zeppelin (untitled).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 December 8. FASTILY 01:48, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Led Zeppelin (untitled).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Amira-Willighagen- 20191130-FAN DAY.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:33, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

tagged OTRS received for 5 months. After reviewing the associated OTRS ticket, I believe it is unlikely that permission will be confirmed FASTILY 03:06, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - the EXIF shows the author of the image is "DAISY WILLEMS". The photographer has already provided OTRS permission for another photo which looks to be from the same session hosted on Commons. See c:File:Amira Willighagen photo by Daisy Willems released to use by Jimmy Futch.jpg, but unless there is confirmed OTRS confirmation for this image either with a separate ticket or if it is covered under the ticket used at Commons, then the license is unverified and the image should be removed. -- Whpq (talk) 18:48, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jô Fernandes.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:31, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

tagged OTRS received for 4 months. After reviewing the associated OTRS ticket, I believe it is unlikely that permission will be confirmed FASTILY 03:09, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: requested verification never completed. ww2censor (talk) 12:43, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No evidence of permission as the OTRS has not been able to validate -- Whpq (talk) 18:50, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Maple Furniture store at night, front façade. Designed by Henry Kulka. Lower Hutt, Wellington, New Zealand. 1960’s.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:31, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

tagged OTRS received for 4 months. After reviewing the associated OTRS ticket, I believe it is unlikely that permission will be confirmed FASTILY 03:09, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: requested completed permission statement never received. ww2censor (talk) 12:42, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Parker Pen retail store, Central Vienna, Austria. Designed and realised by Henry Kulka in 1935.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:31, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

tagged OTRS received for 4 months. After reviewing the associated OTRS ticket, I believe it is unlikely that permission will be confirmed FASTILY 03:09, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: requested completed permission statement never received. ww2censor (talk) 12:42, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No evidence of permission. OTRS has not been able to validate. -- Whpq (talk) 18:51, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:If Only by Nancy Cadogan, 2019.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:31, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

tagged OTRS received for 3 months. After reviewing the associated OTRS ticket, I believe it is unlikely that permission will be confirmed FASTILY 03:11, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: requested verification never completed. ww2censor (talk) 12:40, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Permission is not confirmed. Conversion to fair use would not be an option as this image is not the subject of significant sourced commentary in the article. As something to just show an example of her work, c:File:Dickens and the Card Players by Nancy Cadogan.jpg is an OTRS confirmed image of her work that is freely licensed. -- Whpq (talk) 18:56, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What do you need from the artist to confirm permission? She is happy for the image to be used in any way and as far as I knew had sent permission for both images. Clarification would be great, I find the CP rules on wiki really hard. RisenFall (talk) 10:13, 23 November 2020 (UTC) RisenFall[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mind Clutter by Nancy Cadogan, 2019.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:32, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

tagged OTRS received for 3 months. After reviewing the associated OTRS ticket, I believe it is unlikely that permission will be confirmed FASTILY 03:11, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: requested verification never completed. ww2censor (talk) 12:40, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Permission is not confirmed. Conversion to fair use would not be an option as this image is not the subject of significant sourced commentary in the article. As something to just show an example of her work, c:File:Dickens and the Card Players by Nancy Cadogan.jpg is an OTRS confirmed image of her work that is freely licensed. -- Whpq (talk) 18:56, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What do you need from the artist to confirm permission? She is happy for the image to be used in any way and as far as I knew had sent permission for both images. Clarification would be great, I find the CP rules on wiki really hard. RisenFall (talk) 10:13, 23 November 2020 (UTC) RisenFall[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Maharaj Ajit Singh Saheb.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This might be a copyright violation. It is suspicious to me that the uploader is the creator of what appears to be an official photograph of a royal who passed away in 1978. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 05:07, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wolf Dog.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see no reason at all to keep a local copy of this. User:We hope/User:Renamed user 995577823Xyn added {{Keeplocal}} on without any explanation (and also has this on a ton of their files for no reason that I can see). DemonDays64 (talk) 08:55, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jangbhadur1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jangbhadur1.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 14:24, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

If You Asked Me To (Patti LaBelle)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 December 8. FASTILY 01:48, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:If You Asked Me To.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:If You Asked Me To by Patti LaBelle US cassette.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Be Happy (Mary J. Blige song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 December 8. FASTILY 01:48, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Be Happy (Mary J. Blige song).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Be Happy by Mary J Blige US commercial cassette.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.