Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 June 6

< June 5	June 7 >

June 6

File:Mahatma Gandhi at AAI.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This non-free image is not the subject of significant sourced commentary. The fact that Gandhi visited the institute is well-conveyed with text and does not need an image. Fails WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 02:38, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retain The file was tagged for this discussion earlier since there was no mention of the subject of the file in the article history section. Now, the issue has been addressed, you are saying the opposite. The importance of the fair use of the file was discussed earlier with other admins. It was decided to retain the file, since it was an important landmark in the history of this public institute and it is appropriately added in the history section with fair use licence. Neurofreak (talk) 18:40, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete contrary to what Neurofreak writes, the file was never discussed before at FFD, anyway the image is not the subject of significant sourced commentary and fails WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8. b uidhe 22:44, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Retain~~ It was discussed in my Wikimedia Commons talk page, it was suggested to remove the image and reupload it under fair use license in the Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard. Neurofreak (talk) 23:20, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find such a discussion. I've looked at c:User talk:Neurofreak and c:User talk:Neurofreak/Archive 1 and do not see anything. It would really help if you posted a link the discussion. -- Whpq (talk) 00:30, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Legobot approved the rationale for fair use in 2014.[1] The image resolution was also reduced by one of the admin. Anyway, I do not have any Wikipedia:COI here, you are free to delete the image.

Done Neurofreak (talk) 01:21, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Those are bot edits and not a any sort of admin discussion or approval. All that Legobot did was confirm that a fair use rationale existed. I also don't understand your statement about COI as that was not raised as an issue in this discussion. -- Whpq (talk) 00:57, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cover poster for Our Unwinding Ethos Mini.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free poster being used in a section of an article. There is no sourced commentary about the poster. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 13:34, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The source is disucssed in the article where the picture is displayed. This is the official poster for "our unwinding ethos- mini series" under prodction -> promotional clips. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eirawenn (talk • contribs) 02:31, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The section is not sourced, and the poster itself is not subject of any sort of commentary -- Whpq (talk) 13:33, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails NFCC#8. b uidhe 22:43, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Files from AslanLionheart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete -FASTILY 00:12, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader's claim of the being the copyright holder is dubious. The uploader added a bunch of images claiming to be the copyright holder but were very clear copyright violations. There is no good reason to believe these are any differnt expeciually with a source of "Azerbaijan military base" which is similar to the source provided for many of the other copyright violating images. Whpq (talk) 23:59, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Whpq—probably copyvio. b uidhe 22:42, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.