Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 August 11

< August 10	August 12 >

August 11

File:Anna Marly - La Complainte du partisan - 1963.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 October 2. Izno (talk) 16:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anna Marly - La Complainte du partisan - 1963.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Leonard Cohen, The Partisan, 1968 - 28.5 second excerpt of English transition to French.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Estádio Municipal Alfredo Chiavegato.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be a derivative work of a copyrighted broadcast. See https://mycujoo.tv/en/team/criciuma-ck4hlhscd00ot14qve0x69qe0?id=87872&play=true&tvId=190 Ytoyoda (talk) 13:06, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:42, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, breaching copyright. Giant Snowman 11:44, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Estádio Municipal Maria Tereza Breda.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot of a copyrighted broadcast Ytoyoda (talk) 13:07, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:42, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, breaching copyright. Giant Snowman 11:45, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Estádio Pedro Benedetti.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot of a copyrighted broadcast Ytoyoda (talk) 13:07, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:42, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, breaching copyright. Giant Snowman 11:45, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bitoy in eatbulaga.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn by nominator. Wikiacc (¶) 02:22, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Probable copyvio. The reason is found in its file history. The era when FileEx/Importer wasn't yet arpund and I wasn't yet familiar with Commonshelper, I added {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} tag on July 31, 2017, but a certain @DropTableUsers: removed it about two months later. So I suspect that user is aware that this is not the work of the uploader. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:59, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see no reason in the file history as to why someone think it is a copyvio. The user just removed the MTC without providing any reason. The user have almost no contributions Special:Contributions/DropTableUsers. --MGA73 (talk) 20:00, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In your assumption @MGA73:, is this file OK for Commons, with no potential forseeable issues? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:53, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@JWilz12345: yes unless you have seen anything in file history I missed :-) If you search on Google and Tiney you will find other versions of the file. But the oldest I could see was from 2014 and our version is from 2009. --MGA73 (talk) 15:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Besides, TrueLicense909 asserted at the desc page that it is their work. Maybe they cropped or did some adjustments or uploaded through a medium that destroyed metadata (which was typical during the 2000s). @MGA73: JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:40, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@JWilz12345: Yes! --MGA73 (talk) 15:55, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, I hereby withdraw and requesting an admin to close this nomination. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:01, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Saras 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On the user page user signed as "Rajat Kansal". Watermark on photo says "B Harry". So are we sure it is own work? Users other uploads have no watermark. MGA73 (talk) 19:56, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.