Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 November 30

< November 29	December 1 >

November 30

File:Danielle Cohn At A Party.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work... this image wasn't taken by the Youtube channel it's sourced from. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:50, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this screenshot is from a clip being used as the subject of commentary by the commentator in the youtube video. The free license would apply to the commentary but not the clip. -- Whpq (talk) 12:50, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - non-credible license. I don't see any evidence that the source is freely licensed, and as a derivative work the copyright most likely belongs to the subject. Might be able to claim fair use under non-free video screenshot for the original video, but that's not what we have here creffett (talk) 23:37, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Edna Walling self-portrait.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image lacks a proper fair use tag. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:51, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hanrapetutyun Party Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The given rationale for its copyright status is not valid. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:00, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to non-free logo and add a fair use. Salavat (talk) 07:21, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Logo might be below TOO. Wikiacc (¶) 17:46, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
PD-logo – It's below the TOO. It's a bowen knot in a circle with lettering around that. No original/protectable components–just words and simple geometric shapes. – Levivich 02:57, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Supermanpeanutbutter.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This non-free image is being used to illustrate a rather minor item (bordering on trivia) in the article. The lack of the image would not detract from the reader's understanding of the article. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 04:15, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Previous comment violates NPOV. Subject is the only image used to illustrated the topic in that section of the article. —scarecroe (talk) 07:12, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPOV applies to articles, not discussions. That the image is the only one in a section does not address WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 15:00, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NFCC#8. Editorially, I'd have no objection to a freely licensed image (not required to comply with the irksome WP:NFCC#8) illustrating an otherwise mundane section; but contextually, since other media mentioned in the article do not have corresponding non-free images (film posters, cover art, etc.) next to it, there's no need for this non-free image either. --Nemoschool (talk) 19:20, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KF Vellaznimi FC Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio. It can't be owned by "Gurakuq Dobruna" as derived work (unless he worked for the club as the artist to make the logo for the club). It will be a unused NFC logo too as i will upload a correct version that copy from official website Matthew hk (talk) 15:25, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced with File:KF Vëllaznimi logo.png. Matthew hk (talk) 15:31, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:21, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Obviously not in public domain, but note its subtle differences with File:KF Vëllaznimi logo.png. In the unlikely event that this one is the more accurate logo, it should be reduced and kept for use in KF Vëllaznimi, and the other one deleted. --Nemoschool (talk) 19:02, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - and is doubtful that this is the more accurate logo. It may be an older obsolete one, or may just plain wrong as the source site is one where people can upload logos vectorised logos. The logo currently in use is sourced directly from the FC site so it is clearly correct. -- Whpq (talk) 13:06, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq: I have another edit dispute with other editor BTW and his SVG version: File:FC Vëllaznimi.svg seem finally comply with NFC rules. Matthew hk (talk) 09:01, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.