Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 May 5

< May 4	May 6 >

May 5

File:Ayub Bachchu and his family.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:08, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nonfree image used decoratively failing WP:NFCC#8 Whpq (talk) 13:05, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ethan and Hila Klein with Ethan's iconic Chub and Tuck.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:08, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable by File:Ethan Klein (cropped).jpg, therefore failing WP:NFCC#1 Abequinn14 (talk) 16:53, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is the H3H3 Productions Wikipedia page not the Ethan Klein Wikipedia page. Having your proposed photo appear on the page is well and good but as the main photo it makes more sense to leave as is. Ethan and Hila together is what makes up H3H3 Productions

Delete - the subject of the photo are living persons. A free replacement could be created even one does not currently exist of the two people. Fails WP:NFCC#1. -- Whpq (talk) 05:36, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Leon MacLaren (SES).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. But it's probably good to have the origin information added to the file description. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:39, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is an apparent historical photo. So it's not clear exactly how it is "own work". The same goes for the portrait that this was (for some reason) used to overwrite. The subject died in 1994. So we can probably cobble together a good enough fair use rational if nothing else is available. But if we're using any non free image under fair use, it may be advisable to use one where the source is known. GMG ^talk 21:22, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

-- There is a good reason why it is "own work" it is because it is only based on and looks similar to a historical photo, but is in fact an original rendering based on at least three photos merged and adjusted artistically. Wikid ^as©

If this is true, the license is appropriate and the image should stay, but this fact should be explained in the image description. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 03:51, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:L7-with-joan-jett.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:59, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not needed--superseded by several free media equivalents. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:10, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.